Virtual reality (VR) users are frequently limited by motion sickness-like symptoms. One factor that might influence sickness in VR is the level of control one has in a virtual environment. Reason's Sensory Conflict Theory suggested that motion sickness occurs when incompatibilities exist between four sensory inputs. It is possible that control and sensory compatibility are positively related. If this is the case, increasing control in a virtual environment should result in decreasing symptomology. To test this, the present study used the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire to measure symptomology of 163 participants after exposure to a virtual environment. Three levels of control and compatibility were assessed. It was hypothesized that the participants with control and compatible sensory information would experience fewer symptoms than participants in either the control/incompatible or no control/incompatible conditions. Although significant main effects were found for both gender and condition, the findings were opposite of those hypothesized. Possible explanations for this finding are discussed.
[1]
Robert S. Kennedy,et al.
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness.
,
1993
.
[2]
R. Lubow,et al.
Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness.
,
1991,
Ergonomics.
[3]
Jennifer E. Fowlkes,et al.
Simulator Sickness Is Polygenic and polysymptomatic: Implications for Research
,
1992
.
[4]
Frank Biocca,et al.
Will Simulation Sickness Slow Down the Diffusion of Virtual Environment Technology?
,
1992,
Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.
[5]
Randy F. Pausch,et al.
A Literature Survey for Virtual Environments: Military Flight Simulator Visual Systems and Simulator Sickness
,
1992,
Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.