Effects of frequency and bandwidth on diagnostic information transfer in ultrasonic B-Mode imaging

Transmitted pressure pulses in ultrasonic Bmode imaging systems are commonly characterized by their center frequency and bandwidth. Both parameters are associated with tradeoffs in spatial resolution and signal-to-noise in ultrasonic system design, with no general understanding of where they are optimal when applied to specific clinical exams. We use the ideal observer and simple psychophysical studies with human observers to evaluate the efficiency of information transfer in B-mode imaging as a function of the transmitted pulse center frequency and fractional bandwidth. Our approach uses a statistical model of backscatter relevant to breast imaging, and a 2-D model of pulse propagation based on Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction theory. The statistics of the backscattered signal are combined in an ideal observer calculation that quantifies the task-relevant information contained in the radio-frequency (RF) signal after delay-andsum beamforming. This is followed by a psychophysical evaluation of observer performance on B-mode envelope-detected images in three simple tasks. This experimental design allows us to track the flow of diagnostic information through RF acquisition and subsequent reading of the envelope image. In a low-contrast detection task and a high-contrast boundary discrimination task, optimal efficiency for human observers is observed at the highest center frequencies tested (15 MHz) and at moderate bandwidth (40%). For detection of scattering material in a high-contrast hypoechoic lesion, optimal efficiency was observed at lower center frequencies (5 MHz) and higher bandwidth (80%). The ideal observer analysis shows that this task dependence does not arise in the acquisition stage, where efficiency is maximized at 15 MHz with bandwidths of 60% or greater, but rather in the subsequent processing and reading of the envelope image. In addition, at higher frequencies more information is lost in the processing and reading than in the acquisition of reflected signals.

[1]  R. Phillips Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers , 2008 .

[2]  E. Madsen,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Measurements From 2 to 9 MHz , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  Martin O Culjat,et al.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  An Adaptive Filter to Approximate the Bayesian Strategy for Sonographic Beamforming , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  F. Foster,et al.  Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Christin Wirth The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms , 2002 .

[13]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system. , 2006, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[14]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[15]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Jie Liu,et al.  Efficient array beam forming by spatial filtering for ultrasound B-mode imaging. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. Leek Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  H. Urkowitz Signal Theory and Random Processes , 1983 .

[19]  R. McGough,et al.  Evaluation of the angular spectrum approach for simulations of near-field pressures. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Nghia Q. Nguyen,et al.  Optimal beamforming in ultrasound using the ideal observer , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[24]  M S Soo,et al.  In vivo breast tissue backscatter measurements with 7.5- and 10-MHz transducers. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties , 1998, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Gualtierotti H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, , 1976 .

[28]  Jie Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.