The Redirection: An Indicator of How Teachers Respond to Student Thinking

Responsive teaching occurs when teachers take up and respond to their students’ ideas during instruction (J. L. Pierson, 2008). Although responsive teaching is gaining recognition as an effective strategy for encouraging student learning, few methods of analysis are capable of characterizing the different ways in which teachers take up their students’ ideas in the moment. This article presents and exemplifies a new methodological construct, the redirection, which provides researchers with a means of detecting nuanced differences in how teachers respond to their students’ thinking. The redirection construct emerged via systematic discourse analysis of 1 science teacher’s classroom discussions during 3 implementations of an inquiry-based module on the water cycle. Redirections are defined as instances when a teacher invites students to shift or redirect their attention to a new locus. Such shifts reflect different types of teacher responsiveness and, as such, can be used to capture the different ways in which teachers take up their students’ ideas. This article presents a comprehensive coding scheme for the redirection, in addition to segments of classroom discourse to exemplify each redirection coding category. A comparison of 3 5th-grade teachers using the construct provides an illustrative example of the type of analysis such a coding scheme affords learning sciences researchers.

[1]  April Cordero Maskiewicz,et al.  Understanding the co‐construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment , 2012 .

[2]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Talking about math talk , 2000 .

[3]  H. Mehan,et al.  Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom , 1979 .

[4]  Frances R. Curcio,et al.  Learning mathematics for a new century : 2000 yearbook , 2000 .

[5]  David Hammer,et al.  Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students’ Abilities , 2008 .

[6]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study , 1989 .

[7]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Learning to Listen to Children’s Mathematics , 2008 .

[8]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  SITUATING THE STUDY OF TEACHER NOTICING , 2011 .

[9]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  Using changes in framing to account for differences in a teacher's classroom behavior , 2010, ICLS.

[10]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[11]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club. , 2004 .

[12]  David Hammer,et al.  The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment , 2011 .

[13]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers' Professional Vision , 2009 .

[14]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Teacher Questioning to Elicit Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Elementary School Classrooms , 2009 .

[15]  P. Suri,et al.  Mrs . ) , 2009 .

[16]  Mrs. Miller's evolution in teaching science as inquiry : a case study of a teacher's change in responsiveness , 2012 .

[17]  Dina Tirosh,et al.  Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education , 2008 .

[18]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice , 2008 .

[19]  Jessica Pierson,et al.  The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning , 2008 .

[20]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club , 2008 .

[21]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[22]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Professional Noticing of Children's Mathematical Thinking. , 2010 .

[23]  David Hammer,et al.  Novice Teachers' Attention to Student Thinking , 2009 .

[24]  V. Jacobs,et al.  Making the most of story problems: Honoring students' solution approaches helps teachers capitalize on the power of story problems. No more elusive train scenarios! , 2008 .

[25]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching , 1990 .

[26]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions , 2002 .

[27]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Toward a theory of teaching-in-context , 1998 .

[28]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions , 2005 .

[29]  Erin Marie Furtak,et al.  Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry , 2007 .

[30]  David Hammer,et al.  Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching , 1997 .

[31]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[32]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education , 2008 .

[33]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Learning to Use Children's Thinking in Mathematics Instruction , 1996, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[34]  D. Ball With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[35]  D. Levin What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems , 2008 .

[36]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[37]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes , 2011 .

[38]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  How Different Video Club Designs Support Teachers in “Learning to Notice” , 2006 .