Roboterassistierte Implantation von Pedikelschrauben

[1]  P. Arnold,et al.  Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2022, Neurosurgical focus.

[2]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Initial Intraoperative Experience with Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement with Cirq® Robotic Alignment: An Evaluation of the First 70 Screws , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  S. Krieg,et al.  Clinical efficiency of operating room-based sliding gantry CT as compared to mobile cone-beam CT-based navigated pedicle screw placement in 853 patients and 6733 screws , 2021, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Christopher R. Good,et al.  Is There a Difference Between Navigated and Non-Navigated Robot Cohorts in Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery? A Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Analysis of 2,800 Screws and 372 Patients. , 2021, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  T. O'connor,et al.  Mazor X Stealth Robotic Technology: A Technical Note. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[6]  Arnold B. Vardiman,et al.  Navigated robotic assistance improves pedicle screw accuracy in minimally invasive surgery of the lumbosacral spine: 600 pedicle screws in a single institution , 2020, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[7]  Deeptee Jain,et al.  Initial Single-Institution Experience With a Novel Robotic-Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw and Pelvic Screw Placement With 643 Screws , 2019, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[8]  J. Peltier,et al.  Evaluation of Screw Placement Accuracy in Circumferential Lumbar Arthrodesis Using Robotic Assistance and Intraoperative Flat-Panel Computed Tomography. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[9]  T. Jahng,et al.  Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, Spine.

[10]  Chao Lu,et al.  Retrospective study , 2016, Medicine.

[11]  Hailong Zhang,et al.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis , 2016, Neurosurgical Review.

[12]  V. Costalat,et al.  Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  B. Meyer,et al.  Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon and the Patient During Posterior Lumbar Spinal Instrumentation: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Navigated Versus Non-navigated Freehand Techniques , 2014, Spine.

[15]  R. Härtl,et al.  Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  F. Auer,et al.  Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Placement of Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws: A Prospective Randomized Comparison to Conventional Freehand Screw Implantation , 2012, Spine.

[17]  Raja Rampersaud,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Two-Dimensional Fluoroscopy for the Percutaneous Placement of Lumbosacral Pedicle Screws , 2011, Spine.

[18]  M. Hardenbrook,et al.  Clinical Acceptance and Accuracy Assessment of Spinal Implants Guided With SpineAssist Surgical Robot: Retrospective Study , 2010, Spine.

[19]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[20]  C. Lindsell,et al.  Randomized controlled trial , 2016 .