MRI tissue segmentation incorporating a bias field modulated smoothness prior

This paper examines a refinement to probabilistic intensity based tissue segmentation methods, which makes use of knowledge derived from an MRI bias field estimate. Intensity based labeling techniques have employed local smoothness priors to reduce voxel level tissue labeling errors, by making use of the assumption that, within uniform regions of tissue, a voxel should be highly likely to have a similar tissue assignment to its neighbors. Increasing the size of this neighborhood provides more robustness to noise, but reduces the ability to describe small structures. However, when intensity bias due to RF field inhomogeneity is present within the MRI data, local contrast to noise may vary across the image. We therefore propose an approach to refining the labeling by making use of the bias field estimate, to adapt the neighborhood size applied to reduce local labeling errors. We explore the use of a radially symmetric Gaussian weighted neighborhood, and the use of the mean and median of the adapted region probabilities, to refine local probabilistic labeling. The approach is evaluated using the Montreal brainweb MRI simulator as a gold standard providing known gray, white and CSF tissue segmentation. These results show that the method is capable of improving the local tissue labeling in areas most influenced by inhomogeneity. The method appears most promising in its application to regional tissue volume analysis or higher field MRI data where bias field inhomogeneity can be significant.

[1]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[2]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Optimized homomorphic unsharp masking for MR grayscale inhomogeneity correction , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Image Tissue Classification Using a Partial Volume Model , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Understanding Intensity Non-uniformity in MRI , 1998, MICCAI.

[8]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Retrospective correction of intensity inhomogeneities in MRI , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  M W Vannier,et al.  Post‐acquisition correction of MR inhomogeneities , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Michael Brady,et al.  Estimating the bias field of MR images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.