Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation

Changes in measured image irradiance have many physical causes and are the primary cue for several visual processes, such as edge detection and shape from shading. Using physical models for charged-coupled device (CCD) video cameras and material reflectance, we quantify the variation in digitized pixel values that is due to sensor noise and scene variation. This analysis forms the basis of algorithms for camera characterization and calibration and for scene description. Specifically, algorithms are developed for estimating the parameters of camera noise and for calibrating a camera to remove the effects of fixed pattern nonuniformity and spatial variation in dark current. While these techniques have many potential uses, we describe in particular how they can be used to estimate a measure of scene variation. This measure is independent of image irradiance and can be used to identify a surface from a single sensor band over a range of situations. Experimental results confirm that the models presented in this paper are useful for modeling the different sources of variation in real images obtained from video cameras. >

[1]  John Krumm,et al.  Sampled-grating and crossed-grating models of moire patterns from digital imaging , 1991 .

[2]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Modelling sensors: Toward automatic generation of object recognition program , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  Steven A. Shafer,et al.  Obtaining accurate color images for machine-vision research , 1990, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Walter F. Kosonocky Solid-state image sensors , 1991, Electro International, 1991.

[5]  Hsien-Che Lee,et al.  Modeling Light Reflection for Computer Color Vision , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Morley Blouke,et al.  Charge-coupled devices in astronomy , 1982 .

[7]  Walter L. Smith Probability and Statistics , 1959, Nature.

[8]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Fast Parallel Algorithm for Blind Estimation of Noise Variance , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  M. F. Tompsett,et al.  Charge-coupled imaging devices: Experimental results , 1971 .

[10]  G. E. Smith,et al.  Charge coupled semiconductor devices , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[11]  Berthold K. P. Horn SHAPE FROM SHADING: A METHOD FOR OBTAINING THE SHAPE OF A SMOOTH OPAQUE OBJECT FROM ONE VIEW , 1970 .

[12]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Using color for geometry-insensitive segmentation , 1989 .

[13]  Steven A. Shafer,et al.  Using color to separate reflection components , 1985 .

[14]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[15]  Lawrence B. Wolff,et al.  Polarization-Based Material Classification from Specular Reflection , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  David W. Hafemeister,et al.  Arms control verification : the technologies that make it possible , 1986 .

[17]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Surface Reflection: Physical and Geometrical Perspectives , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Segmentation through Variable-Order Surface Fitting , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Horst A. Beyer Linejitter and geometric calibration of CCD-cameras , 1990 .

[20]  Stephen A. Dyer,et al.  Digital signal processing , 2018, 8th International Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004..

[21]  S K Park,et al.  Aliasing and blurring in 2-D sampled imagery. , 1980, Applied optics.

[22]  M. F. Tompsett,et al.  Experimental verification of the charge coupled device concept , 1970, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[23]  D. Fritsch,et al.  Accuracy of videometry with CCD sensors , 1990 .