Collecting Kinematic Data on a Ski Track with Optoelectronic Stereophotogrammetry: A Methodological Study Assessing the Feasibility of Bringing the Biomechanics Lab to the Field

In the laboratory, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry is one of the most commonly used motion capture systems; particularly, when position- or orientation-related analyses of human movements are intended. However, for many applied research questions, field experiments are indispensable, and it is not a priori clear whether optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric systems can be expected to perform similarly to in-lab experiments. This study aimed to assess the instrumental errors of kinematic data collected on a ski track using optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry, and to investigate the magnitudes of additional skiing-specific errors and soft tissue/suit artifacts. During a field experiment, the kinematic data of different static and dynamic tasks were captured by the use of 24 infrared-cameras. The distances between three passive markers attached to a rigid bar were stereophotogrammetrically reconstructed and, subsequently, were compared to the manufacturer-specified exact values. While at rest or skiing at low speed, the optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric system’s accuracy and precision for determining inter-marker distances were found to be comparable to those known for in-lab experiments (< 1 mm). However, when measuring a skier’s kinematics under “typical” skiing conditions (i.e., high speeds, inclined/angulated postures and moderate snow spraying), additional errors were found to occur for distances between equipment-fixed markers (total measurement errors: 2.3 ± 2.2 mm). Moreover, for distances between skin-fixed markers, such as the anterior hip markers, additional artifacts were observed (total measurement errors: 8.3 ± 7.1 mm). In summary, these values can be considered sufficient for the detection of meaningful position- or orientation-related differences in alpine skiing. However, it must be emphasized that the use of optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry on a ski track is seriously constrained by limited practical usability, small-sized capture volumes and the occurrence of extensive snow spraying (which results in marker obscuration). The latter limitation possibly might be overcome by the use of more sophisticated cluster-based marker sets.

[1]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[3]  Shinji Miyazaki,et al.  Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems , 1995 .

[4]  Matej Supej,et al.  3D measurements of alpine skiing with an inertial sensor motion capture suit and GNSS RTK system , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  T. Kepple,et al.  Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait , 1997 .

[6]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[7]  Matej Supej,et al.  Impact of the steepness of the slope on the biomechanics of World Cup slalom skiers. , 2015, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[8]  Erich Müller,et al.  Collecting kinematic data on a ski/snowboard track with panning, tilting, and zooming cameras: Is there sufficient accuracy for a biomechanical analysis? , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[10]  Erich Müller,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of new techniques in alpine skiing and ski-jumping , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[12]  Kitae Kim,et al.  Potential of IMU Sensors in Performance Analysis of Professional Alpine Skiers , 2016, Sensors.

[13]  Erich Müller,et al.  Turn Characteristics of a Top World Class Athlete in Giant Slalom: A Case Study Assessing Current Performance Prediction Concepts , 2012 .

[14]  R. Reid,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic study of alpine skiing technique in slalom , 2010 .

[15]  Frédéric Meyer,et al.  Aerodynamic drag modeling of alpine skiers performing giant slalom turns. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Erich Müller,et al.  Sidecut radius and the mechanics of turning—equipment designed to reduce risk of severe traumatic knee injuries in alpine giant slalom ski racing , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  Erich Müller,et al.  Course setting and selected biomechanical variables related to injury risk in alpine ski racing: an explorative case study , 2012, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[18]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[19]  Erich Müller,et al.  Three-dimensional knee joint loading in alpine skiing: a comparison between a carved and a skidded turn. , 2012, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[20]  Erich Müller,et al.  Determination of the centre of mass kinematics in alpine skiing using differential global navigation satellite systems , 2015, Jurnal sport science.

[21]  P Haugen,et al.  The application of principal component analysis to quantify technique in sports , 2014, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[22]  J. Richards,et al.  The measurement of human motion: A comparison of commercially available systems , 1999 .

[23]  H. Holmberg,et al.  Mechanical parameters as predictors of performance in alpine World Cup slalom racing , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[24]  Wyatt Page,et al.  Fusion motion capture: A prototype system using inertial measurement units and GPS for the biomechanical analysis of ski racing , 2008 .