Conservation of the Built Heritage: Pilot Site Approach to Design a Sustainable Process

The conservation project of built heritage is a complex process, dealing with an extremely heterogeneous range of elements and different substrates with a large variety of conservation conditions. In recent years, its sustainability has become a relevant issue, due to the general limitation of resources and unique features of cultural heritage assets. The conservation project, therefore, requires a thorough knowledge of the specific characteristics of the site, a reliable evaluation of the treatment’s efficacy and durability, and efficient control of procedures and timing of the site during the conservation activities. A suitable approach to design the intervention is the implementation of a pilot site for the knowledge of surfaces and structures, and for the testing of different operative procedures. This approach needs the collaborative work of a multidisciplinary team coordinated by the project manager. This paper reports on the design of the conservation project of the Renaissance facade of the Monza cathedral, with the development of a pilot site as a relevant example of a complex surface. The three-phase process—preliminary knowledge, testing and implementation of the treatment methodologies, and scale-up to the general conservation project—is described and discussed with significant reference to real data from the case study.

[1]  J. Rodrigues,et al.  Laboratory and onsite study of barium hydroxide as a consolidant for high porosity limestones , 2016 .

[2]  Rafael Fort,et al.  Assessment of Different Methods for Cleaning the Limestone Façades of the Former Workers Hospital of Madrid, Spain , 2011 .

[3]  M. Riccardi,et al.  Improving sustainable cultural heritage restoration work through life cycle assessment based model , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[4]  J. Weber,et al.  Efficiency and Compatibility of Selected Alkoxysilanes on Porous Carbonate and Silicate Stones , 2019, Materials.

[5]  Roberto Pini,et al.  Assessment of the state of conservation of stone artworks after laser cleaning: comparison with conventional cleaning results on a two-decade follow up , 2000 .

[6]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  On-site monitoring for better selection of stone repairs: a case study , 2016, Heritage Science.

[7]  P. P. Lottici,et al.  Efficiency assessment of hybrid coatings for natural building stones: Advanced and multi-scale laboratory investigation , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[8]  Silvia A. Centeno,et al.  The New York Public Library: Protective Treatment for Sugaring Marble , 2010 .

[9]  Pier Paolo Diotallevi,et al.  The contribution of urban-scale environmental monitoring to materials diagnostics: A study on the Cathedral of Modena (Italy) , 2011 .

[10]  M. Matteini,et al.  Efficiency and resistance of the artificial oxalate protection treatment on marble against chemical weathering , 2007 .

[11]  John Hughes,et al.  Decision support criteria and the development of a decision support tool for the selection of conservation materials for the built cultural heritage , 2019, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[12]  E. Franzoni,et al.  Repair of sugaring marble by ammonium phosphate: Comparison with ethyl silicate and ammonium oxalate and pilot application to historic artifact , 2015 .

[13]  L. Toniolo,et al.  Improvements in marble protection by means of innovative photocatalytic nanocomposites , 2018, Progress in Organic Coatings.

[14]  L. Toniolo,et al.  On-site monitoring of the performance of innovative treatments for marble conservation in architectural heritage , 2017, Heritage Science.

[15]  J. Delgado Rodrigues,et al.  Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions , 2007 .

[16]  Lucia Toniolo,et al.  Biofilm colonization of metamorphic lithotypes of a renaissance cathedral exposed to urban atmosphere. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  L. Toniolo,et al.  The deterioration of metamorphic serpentinites used in historical architecture under atmospheric conditions , 2017, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[18]  José Delgado Rodrigues,et al.  Incompatibility risk assessment procedure for the cleaning of built heritage , 2016 .

[19]  L. Toniolo,et al.  Stone/Coating Interaction and Durability of Si-Based Photocatalytic Nanocomposites Applied to Porous Lithotypes , 2018, Materials.

[20]  G. M. Crisci,et al.  Testing the antibacterial activity of doped TiO2 for preventing biodeterioration of cultural heritage building materials , 2014 .

[21]  Antonia Moropoulou,et al.  Assessment of Cleaning Conservation Interventions on Architectural Surfaces Using an Integrated Methodology , 2002 .

[22]  Tabitha Dreyfuss Interactions on site between powdering porous limestone, natural salt mixtures and applied ammonium oxalate , 2019, Heritage Science.