Conservation of the Built Heritage: Pilot Site Approach to Design a Sustainable Process
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Rodrigues,et al. Laboratory and onsite study of barium hydroxide as a consolidant for high porosity limestones , 2016 .
[2] Rafael Fort,et al. Assessment of Different Methods for Cleaning the Limestone Façades of the Former Workers Hospital of Madrid, Spain , 2011 .
[3] M. Riccardi,et al. Improving sustainable cultural heritage restoration work through life cycle assessment based model , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.
[4] J. Weber,et al. Efficiency and Compatibility of Selected Alkoxysilanes on Porous Carbonate and Silicate Stones , 2019, Materials.
[5] Roberto Pini,et al. Assessment of the state of conservation of stone artworks after laser cleaning: comparison with conventional cleaning results on a two-decade follow up , 2000 .
[6] Robert J. Flatt,et al. On-site monitoring for better selection of stone repairs: a case study , 2016, Heritage Science.
[7] P. P. Lottici,et al. Efficiency assessment of hybrid coatings for natural building stones: Advanced and multi-scale laboratory investigation , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.
[8] Silvia A. Centeno,et al. The New York Public Library: Protective Treatment for Sugaring Marble , 2010 .
[9] Pier Paolo Diotallevi,et al. The contribution of urban-scale environmental monitoring to materials diagnostics: A study on the Cathedral of Modena (Italy) , 2011 .
[10] M. Matteini,et al. Efficiency and resistance of the artificial oxalate protection treatment on marble against chemical weathering , 2007 .
[11] John Hughes,et al. Decision support criteria and the development of a decision support tool for the selection of conservation materials for the built cultural heritage , 2019, Journal of Cultural Heritage.
[12] E. Franzoni,et al. Repair of sugaring marble by ammonium phosphate: Comparison with ethyl silicate and ammonium oxalate and pilot application to historic artifact , 2015 .
[13] L. Toniolo,et al. Improvements in marble protection by means of innovative photocatalytic nanocomposites , 2018, Progress in Organic Coatings.
[14] L. Toniolo,et al. On-site monitoring of the performance of innovative treatments for marble conservation in architectural heritage , 2017, Heritage Science.
[15] J. Delgado Rodrigues,et al. Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions , 2007 .
[16] Lucia Toniolo,et al. Biofilm colonization of metamorphic lithotypes of a renaissance cathedral exposed to urban atmosphere. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.
[17] L. Toniolo,et al. The deterioration of metamorphic serpentinites used in historical architecture under atmospheric conditions , 2017, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.
[18] José Delgado Rodrigues,et al. Incompatibility risk assessment procedure for the cleaning of built heritage , 2016 .
[19] L. Toniolo,et al. Stone/Coating Interaction and Durability of Si-Based Photocatalytic Nanocomposites Applied to Porous Lithotypes , 2018, Materials.
[20] G. M. Crisci,et al. Testing the antibacterial activity of doped TiO2 for preventing biodeterioration of cultural heritage building materials , 2014 .
[21] Antonia Moropoulou,et al. Assessment of Cleaning Conservation Interventions on Architectural Surfaces Using an Integrated Methodology , 2002 .
[22] Tabitha Dreyfuss. Interactions on site between powdering porous limestone, natural salt mixtures and applied ammonium oxalate , 2019, Heritage Science.