Artificial Bee Colony for Classification of Acoustic Emission Signal Source

In this paper the approach for classification of acoustic emission signals to their respective sources is employed using a swarm intelligence technique called artificial bee colony. In this work, artificial bee colony is employed to train a multilayer perceptron neural network which is used for the classification of the acoustic emission signal to their respective source. Acoustic emission is carried out using pulse, pencil and spark signal source on the surface of solid steel block. The signal parameters are measured using AET 5000 system. To begin with, the complexity for acoustic emission data set is verified using conventional statistical technique like principal component analysis and traditional training algorithm like multilayer perceptron neural network trained using the backpropagation algorithm. The experiment shows in both the case the classification is not accurate. For this complex acoustic emission data set multilayer perceptron neural network trained using the artificial bee colony algorith...

[1]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities , 1991, Neural Computation.

[2]  Z. Piasta,et al.  Classification of acoustic emission sources in CFRP assisted by pattern recognition analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Manu Pratap Singh,et al.  Analysis of pattern classification for the multidimensional parity-bit-checking problem with hybrid evolutionary feed-forward neural network , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[4]  J. A. Brandon,et al.  Classification of acoustic emission signatures using a self-organization neural network , 1999 .

[5]  Lalit M. Patnaik,et al.  Application of genetic programming for multicategory pattern classification , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[6]  Alex Alves Freitas,et al.  Data mining with an ant colony optimization algorithm , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[7]  E. Kannatey-Asibu,et al.  Classification of AE signals for monitoring martensite formation from welding , 1990 .

[8]  S. N. Omkar,et al.  Rule extraction for classification of acoustic emission signals using Ant Colony Optimisation , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[9]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant colony optimization theory: A survey , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Teruo Kishi,et al.  A study on fracture behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites by using acoustic emission source characterization , 2000 .

[11]  D. Karaboga,et al.  On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  W. T. Collins,et al.  Acoustic classification of marine habitats in coastal Newfoundland , 2002 .

[13]  Duncan P. Hand,et al.  TOOL WEAR PREDICTION FROM ACOUSTIC EMISSION AND SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS VIA AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK , 1999 .

[14]  John A. Marchant,et al.  Comparison of a Bayesian classifier with a multilayer feed-forward neural network using the example of plant/weed/soil discrimination , 2003 .

[15]  Jesús Cid-Sueiro,et al.  Cost functions to estimate a posteriori probabilities in multiclass problems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  A Short Proof of the Posterior Probability Property of Classifier Neural Networks , 1996, Neural Computation.

[17]  Lindsay I. Smith,et al.  A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis , 2002 .

[18]  Tong Zhang.  Statistical behavior and consistency of classification methods based on convex risk minimization , 2003 .

[19]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Machine Learning for the Detection of Oil Spills in Satellite Radar Images , 1998, Machine Learning.

[20]  Narasimhan Sundararajan,et al.  Risk-sensitive loss functions for sparse multi-category classification problems , 2008, Inf. Sci..