An analytical contrast between fitness maximization and selection for mixability.

[1]  Adi Livnat,et al.  Sex, mixability, and modularity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Adi Livnat,et al.  A mixability theory for the role of sex in evolution , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Elena,et al.  The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Kristen K. Dang,et al.  Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks , 2006, Nature.

[5]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Muller's ratchet under epistatic selection. , 1994, Genetics.

[6]  A. Kondrashov.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination. , 1984, Genetical research.

[7]  F B Christiansen,et al.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Levin,et al.  Pest Pressure and Recombination Systems in Plants , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[9]  E. Mayr.  Populations, Species, and Evolution, An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution , 1970 .

[10]  C. Darwin.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[11]  M. Kimura,et al.  Evolution in Sexual and Asexual Populations , 1965, The American Naturalist.

[12]  H. Muller.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[13]  S. Wright,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENE FREQUENCIES IN POPULATIONS. , 1937, Science.

[14]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .