Since year 2000 a number of national energy management systems (EnMS) standards and specifications have been developed. To support EnMS implementation in industry some governments have launched agreements centered around energy management practices. National experiences show that such policy programs can achieve significant energy efficiency improvements. Implementation of industrial EnMSs has gradually increased and uptake can be expected to accelerate as the international standard (ISO 50001) gains further recognition. Since EnMS complements, or replaces, other energy or climate policies (e.g. emissions trading, energy or carbon taxes) it makes sense to systematically evaluate its implementation in industry. Accurate information needs to be compiled and rated against relevant criteria to confirm desired impact. In their assessments evaluators need to address several issues. Firstly, EnMS are embedded in a context which makes it difficult to attribute results. Secondly, a principle of EnMS is that firms set internal targets to improve energy performance, but these targets might not be consistent with societal objectives. Finally, EnMS certification issued by external auditors gives approval according to standard but cannot guarantee a desired impact. These and other aspects are analyzed and also proposed to be considered in EnMS evaluation. The methods include literature studies, stakeholder consultations to gather empirical input from practitioners, and quantitative data assessments of energy performance. The main contributions are documented experiences from industrial EnMS implementation in Sweden and based on these a set of considerations to be addressed by policy makers and academics in developing a plan for industrial EnMS evaluation. (Less)
[1]
Lars J Nilsson,et al.
Energy management in Swedish pulp and paper industry - the daily grind that matters
,
2011
.
[2]
Lars J Nilsson,et al.
Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instruments
,
2008
.
[3]
Caiman J. Cahill,et al.
Quantifying the savings of an industry energy efficiency programme
,
2012
.
[4]
Competitive low carbon economy in 2050
,
2013
.
[5]
Catherine Cooremans,et al.
Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of investments matter?
,
2012
.
[6]
Mikael Ottosson,et al.
An energy efficient Swedish pulp and paper industry – exploring barriers to and driving forces for cost-effective energy efficiency investments
,
2008
.
[7]
Lars J Nilsson,et al.
Energy efficiency in energy-intensive industries—an evaluation of the Swedish voluntary agreement PFE
,
2012
.
[8]
Aie,et al.
Energy Technology Perspectives 2012
,
2006
.
[9]
W. E. Watkins,et al.
Investment in Energy Efficiency: Do the Characteristics of Firms Matter?
,
1998,
Review of Economics and Statistics.
[10]
Lars J Nilsson,et al.
New energy strategies in the Swedish pulp and paper industry - The role of national and EU climate and energy policies
,
2011
.
[11]
Barney L. Capehart,et al.
Guide to Energy Management
,
1969
.