Phase Extension: A reply

Abstract Phase Extension is a theory of ‘domain widening” resulting from movement of the head of a phase (either an inherent phase or a derived phase that is itself the result of Phase Extension) to the next head up the tree. Phase Extension is the automatic and unavoidable result of movement of such head movement. It saves some operations that would be ungrammatical without its application, but it blocks others that would have been perfectly legitimate if no Phase Extension had taken place. In my target paper, I presented a variety of empirical domains in which Phase Extension provides an explanatory account for otherwise often quite recalcitrant data. In the following pages, I address many of the comments and questions raised by my commentators regarding some of the empirical proposals, the technical ingredients of the theory, and their conceptual underpinnings. In the closing section, I will consider Pesetsky's alternative ‘property delay’ model, and point to some areas where it makes predictions that are dierent from, and as far as I can see less accurate than, those made by the Phase Extension theory.

[1]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure , 2005 .

[2]  Benjamin Bruening QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[4]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Lowering and Mid-Size Clauses * , 1997 .

[5]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions , 1995 .

[6]  L. Rizzi Null objects in Italian and the theory of 'pro' , 1986 .

[7]  Kleanthes K. Grohmann,et al.  Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of movement dependencies , 2003 .

[8]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  Connectivity in Specificational Sentences , 1999 .

[9]  E. Hoekstra On D-pronouns and the Movement of Topic Features , 1999 .

[10]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[11]  Kyle B. Johnson Object positions , 1991 .

[12]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Null Antecedents and Proper Government , 2022 .

[13]  Heejeong Ko,et al.  Syntactic edges and linearization , 2005 .

[14]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas , 2006 .

[15]  A. Kroch,et al.  Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[16]  Joseph E. Aoun,et al.  Scope and constituency , 1989 .

[17]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach , 1993 .

[18]  K Abels,et al.  Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding , 2003 .

[19]  Anders Holmberg,et al.  Remarks on Holmberg's generalization , 1999 .

[20]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[22]  Andrea Moro,et al.  The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure , 1997 .

[23]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  The Internal Structure of Small Clauses: New Evidence from Inversion , 1995 .

[24]  E. Hoekstra,et al.  De structuur van CP : Functionele projecties voor topics en vraagwoorden in het Nederlands , 1994 .

[25]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .

[26]  Jane Grimshaw,et al.  Words and Structure , 2004 .

[27]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar: a reply , 2005 .

[28]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[29]  Anders Holmberg Linearization in two ways , 2005 .

[30]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .