Computational biomechanics of a lumbar motion segment in pure and combined shear loads.

Anterior shear has been implicated as a risk factor in spinal injuries. A 3D nonlinear poroelastic finite element model study of a lumbar motion segment L4-L5 was performed to predict the temporal shear response under various single and combined shear loads. Effects of nucleotomy and facetectomy as well as changes in the posture and facet gap distance were analyzed as well. Comparison of the predicted anterior displacement and stiffness response with available measurements indicates satisfactory agreement. Under shear loads up to 400 N, the model predicted an almost linear displacement response. With increasing shear load and/or compressive preload, the stiffening behavior becomes evident, primarily due to stretched collagen fibers and greater facet interactions. Removal of the facets markedly decreases the segmental stiffness in shear and thus highlights the importance of the facets in resisting shear force; 61-87% of the applied shear force is transmitted through the facets depending on the magnitude of the applied shear and compressive preload. Fluid exudation during the day as well as reduced facet gap distance and a more extended posture yielded higher facet joint forces. The shear resistance of the motion segment remains almost the same with time despite the transfer of load sharing from the disc to facets. Large forces on facet joints are computed especially under greater compression preloads, shear forces and extension rotations, as time progresses and with smaller gap distances. The disc contribution on the other hand increases under larger shear loads, smaller compression preloads, flexed postures, larger facet gap distances and at transient periods.

[1]  J. Wark,et al.  Compressive and shear force generated in the lumbar spine of female rowers. , 2000, International journal of sports medicine.

[2]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Load-bearing characteristics of lumbar facets in normal and surgically altered spinal segments. , 1983, Spine.

[4]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Gunnar B J Andersson,et al.  Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Patricia Rosales,et al.  Comparison between the , 2010 .

[7]  J R Potvin,et al.  Reduction in anterior shear forces on the L 4L 5 disc by the lumbar musculature. , 1991, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  Keith D K Luk,et al.  Pure Shear Properties of Lumbar Spinal Joints and the Effect of Tissue Sectioning on Load Sharing , 2005, Spine.

[10]  H. Wilke,et al.  Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine--a probabilistic finite element analysis. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Gerd Huber,et al.  Shear strength of the human lumbar spine. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  J M Huyghe,et al.  A comparison between mechano-electrochemical and biphasic swelling theories for soft hydrated tissues. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  Segmental Motion and Instability , 1987, Spine.

[15]  J P Callaghan,et al.  Muscle Activity and Low Back Loads Under External Shear and Compressive Loading , 1995, Spine.

[16]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Muscle Activity, Internal Loads, and Stability of the Human Spine in Standing Postures: Combined Model and In Vivo Studies , 2004, Spine.

[17]  A B Schultz,et al.  Stiffness properties and geometry of lumbar spine posterior elements. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Gijsbertus J Verkerke,et al.  Influence of Interpersonal Geometrical Variation on Spinal Motion Segment Stiffness: Implications for Patient-Specific Modeling , 2011, Spine.

[19]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[20]  V K Goel,et al.  A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. , 1993, Spine.

[21]  W. Skalli,et al.  Influence of geometrical factors on the behavior of lumbar spine segments: A finite element analysis , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[22]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  Uwe Wolfram,et al.  Structural Behavior of Human Lumbar Intervertebral Disc under Direct Shear , 2015, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[24]  H. Wilke,et al.  Finite element study of human lumbar disc nucleus replacements , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[25]  S. McGill,et al.  Changes in lumbar lordosis modify the role of the extensor muscles. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  E. Kirwan,et al.  Partial undercutting facetectomy for bony entrapment of the lumbar nerve root. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  E Garrido,et al.  Unilateral facetectomy approach for lateral lumbar disc herniation. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  R. Norman,et al.  A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  G B Andersson,et al.  The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. , 1999, Spine.

[30]  HighWire Press,et al.  The journal of bone and joint surgery - British volume , 1948 .

[31]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Is it possible to estimate the compressive force in the lumbar spine from intradiscal pressure measurements? A finite element evaluation. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[32]  Keita Ito,et al.  Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  I. Stokes,et al.  Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  A Plamondon,et al.  A comparative study of two trunk biomechanical models under symmetric and asymmetric loadings. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  K. Yang,et al.  The biomechanics of lumbar graded facetectomy under anterior-shear load , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Computation of trunk equilibrium and stability in free flexion-extension movements at different velocities. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. , 1999, Spine.

[39]  E. Schneider,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[40]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy , 1992, Spine.

[41]  Hutton Wc,et al.  Can variations in intervertebral disc height affect the mechanical function of the disc , 1996 .

[42]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Remedy for fictive negative pressures in biphasic finite element models of the intervertebral disc during unloading , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[44]  A Finite Element Study on the , 2012 .

[45]  William C. Hutton,et al.  Can Variations in Intervertebral Disc Height Affect the Mechanical Function of the Disc? , 1996, Spine.