Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank: clinical privileges action reports.

CONTEXT The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is believed to be an important source of information for peer review activities by the majority of those who use it. However, concern has been raised that hospitals may be underreporting physicians with performance problems to the NPDB. OBJECTIVE To examine variation in clinical privileges action reporting by hospitals to the NPDB, changes in reporting over time, and the association of hospital characteristics with reporting. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of privileges action reports to the NPDB between 1991 and 1995, linked with the 1992 and 1995 databases from the Annual Survey of Hospitals conducted by the American Hospital Association. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 4743 short-term, nonfederal, general medical/surgical hospitals throughout the United States that were continuously open between 1991-1995 and registered with the NPDB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Reporting of 1 or more privileges actions during the 5-year study period and (2) privileges action reporting rates (numbers of actions reported per 100000 admissions). RESULTS Study hospitals reported 3328 privileges actions between 1991 and 1995; 34.2% reported 1 or more actions during the period. The range of privileges action reporting rates for these hospitals was 0.40 to 52.27 per 100000 admissions, with an overall rate of 2.36 per 100000 admissions. The proportion of hospitals reporting an action decreased from 11.6% in 1991 to 10.0% in 1995 (P=.008). After adjustment for other factors, urban hospitals had significantly higher reporting than rural hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.43]), while members of the Council of Teaching Hospitals of the Association of American Medical Colleges had significantly lower reporting than nonmembers (adjusted OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40-0.73]). There were notable regional differences in reporting, with the east south Central region having the lowest rate per 100000 admissions (1.49 [95% CI, 1.33-1.65]). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate a low and declining level of hospital privileges action reporting to the NPDB. Several potential explanations exist, 1 of which is that the information reported to the NPDB is incomplete.

[1]  I. Moscovice,et al.  Quality Assurance Issues Raised by Proposed Limited-Service Rural Hospitals , 1991, Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians.

[2]  S. Scheutzow State Medical Peer Review: High Cost But No Benefit—Is It Time for a Change? , 1999, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[3]  E. Ryzen,et al.  The National Practitioner Data Bank. Problems and proposed reforms. , 1992 .

[4]  R. Goldman,et al.  The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  T. Brennan,et al.  INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS , 2008 .

[6]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  I. Johnson Reports to the National Practitioner Data Bank , 1991 .

[8]  D. Wakefield,et al.  The role of peer review in a health care organization driven by TQM/CQI. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[9]  R H Brook,et al.  Watching the doctor-watchers. How well do peer review organization methods detect hospital care quality problems? , 1992, JAMA.

[10]  N M Laird,et al.  Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. , 1991, JAMA.

[11]  C. Roberts Quality assurance and risk management in small and rural hospitals: the roles of trustees, administration, and medical staff. , 1987, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[12]  H G Welch,et al.  Readmission after surgery in Washington State rural hospitals. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[13]  A M Bernard,et al.  Evaluating the Care of General Medicine Inpatients: How Good Is Implicit Review? , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  N. Hershey Compensation and Accountability: The Way to Improve Peer Review , 1992, Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians.

[15]  F. Mullan,et al.  The National Practitioner Data Bank. Report from the first year. , 1992, JAMA.

[16]  A A Rimm,et al.  Hospital characteristics and mortality rates. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Rosenblatt,et al.  Is non-metropolitan residence a risk factor for poor birth outcome in the U.S.? , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[18]  D Draper,et al.  Hospital characteristics and quality of care. , 1992, JAMA.