A process approach to understanding multiple open source innovation contests - Assessing the contest structures, execution, and participant responses in the android developer challenges

Abstract As organizations recognize the importance of open innovation, understanding emerging mechanisms for soliciting outside participation is a growing area of academic interest. Strategies can be as diverse as hosting innovation contests, sponsoring open source software (OSS) communities, or engaging in bilateral partnerships. While these have been studied as distinct strategies, more recent work has identified the possibility for combining these approaches, or deploying different methods at different times. Because each of these open innovation strategies are characterized by different incentive systems as well as different work and social practices, the combination of these can reveal unexpected participant responses (e.g., collaboration in innovation contests, competitive behavior in OSS communities). This study examines an explicit attempt to combine these strategies, to host an open source innovation contest. Through the case of Google's Android Developer Challenge, a series of multi-million dollar innovation contests used to launch an OSS community over several years, this study utilized a process approach to understanding open source innovation contests to understand how participants responded and also how the contest conditions changed over time. We found several practices of competition and collaboration that worked around the short term and long term incentives and constraints posed by the contest. We also followed the contest through various transition phases and found that participants reacted strongly to changes in structure, execution, and shifting conditions over time. Through this case, we extend our understanding of innovation contests as a process and specifically the promises and pitfalls of open source innovation contests.

[1]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Risk Taking in Online Crowdsourcing Tournaments , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[3]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Value Capture and Crowdsourcing , 2013 .

[4]  Angelika C. Bullinger,et al.  Call for Attention - Attracting and Activating Innovators , 2010 .

[5]  Dwayne Spradlin,et al.  Are you solving the right problem? , 2016, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Hanieh Javadi Khasraghi,et al.  Crowdsourcing contests: understanding the effect of competitors’ participation history on their performance , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  A framework for creating hybrid‐open source software communities , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[9]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[10]  Dirk Lüttgens,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation Beyond the Pilot Stage: Barriers and Organizational Interventions , 2012 .

[11]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention , 2014 .

[12]  Christoph Riedl,et al.  Teams vs. Crowds: A Field Test of the Relative Contribution of Incentives, Member Ability, and Emergent Collaboration to Crowd-Based Problem Solving Performance , 2016 .

[13]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Why Individuals Participate in Micro-task Crowdsourcing Work Environment: Revealing Crowdworkers' Perceptions , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Successive Open Innovation Contests and Incentives: Winner‐Take‐All or Multiple Prizes? , 2018 .

[15]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Machiavellianism or Morality: Which Behavior Pays Off In Online Innovation Contests? , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Shared leadership in the Apache project , 1999, CACM.

[18]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Fair play: Perceived fairness in crowdsourcing competitions and the customer relationship-related consequences , 2017 .

[19]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Guido Dolfus,et al.  Everything community? Destructive processes in communities of crowdsourcing competitions , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[21]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms , 2018 .

[22]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[24]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  Optimal Design of Consumer Contests , 2007 .

[25]  Richard D. Wang,et al.  Tournaments for Ideas , 2010 .

[26]  Blake Hallinan,et al.  Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture , 2016, New Media Soc..

[27]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Idea Rejected, Tie Formed: Organizations’ Feedback on Crowdsourced Ideas , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.

[28]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[29]  Nicolas Ducheneaut,et al.  Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Nikolay Archak,et al.  Money, glory and cheap talk: analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com , 2010, WWW '10.

[31]  Karim R Lakhani,et al.  Using the crowd as an innovation partner. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[32]  Akin Kazakçi,et al.  The generation of common purpose in innovation partnerships: a design perspective , 2012 .

[33]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Innovation Contests , 2011, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[34]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[35]  J. Füller,et al.  Why Co‐Creation Experience Matters? Creative Experience and its Impact on the Quantity and Quality of Creative Contributions , 2011 .

[36]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[37]  Luciano Kay,et al.  Technological Innovation and Prize Incentives , 2012 .

[38]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Tournament Theory , 2014 .

[39]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Community-Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation , 2010 .

[40]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[41]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice , 2014 .

[42]  Maria Antikainen,et al.  Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation , 2010 .

[43]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Problems, theories, and governing the crowd , 2016 .

[44]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[45]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[46]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[47]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[48]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[49]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests , 2011 .

[50]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[51]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[52]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Keith A. Butler,et al.  Connecting the design of software to the design , 1999, CACM.

[54]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[55]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Idea Evaluation Mechanisms for Collective Intelligence in Open Innovation Communities: Do Traders Outperform Raters? , 2011, ICIS.

[56]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[57]  Katja Hutter,et al.  User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[60]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[61]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Innovation Contests: A Review, Classification and Outlook , 2012 .

[62]  M. Markus The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? , 2007 .

[63]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging the Wisdom of Crowds: Designing an IT-Supported Ideas Competition for an ERP Software Company , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[64]  Kouichi Kishida,et al.  Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[65]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  From Peer Production to Productization: A Study of Socially Enabled Business Exchanges in Open Source Service Networks , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[67]  Siobhan O’Mahony Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .

[68]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Strategic effort allocation in online innovation tournaments , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[69]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Role of Feedback: Evidence from Field Experiments with Innovation Tournaments , 2017 .

[70]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[71]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[72]  Y. Benkler,et al.  The Wealth of Networks , 2008 .

[73]  Roman M. Sheremeta,et al.  A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments , 2012, Experimental Economics.

[74]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[75]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[76]  Jan Henrik Sieg,et al.  Managerial Challenges in Open Innovation: A Study of Innovation Intermediation in the Chemical Industry , 2010 .