Modelling the Kaiser effect and deformation rate analysis in sandstone using the discrete element method

Abstract Non-destructive methods for rock in-situ stress estimation have been extensively investigated in recent years. Such techniques as deformation rate analysis and the acoustic emission method, which are based on ‘rock memory’ recovery utilising the Kaiser effect, have become popular among many practitioners. The physical nature of this phenomenon has not however been universally established. In this study the primary cause of the Kaiser effect, the interaction of microcracks, was investigated. The numerical modelling package PFC 2D was employed for creation of a synthetic cored specimen and simulation of uniaxial compression tests. The ability of the numerical model to reproduce the Kaiser effect and the deformation rate analysis phenomenon was confirmed, and a direct comparison was made between laboratory and numerical observations. The link between the Kaiser effect/deformation rate analysis and development of microcracks was established. The realistic behaviour of the numerical model can be used for exploration of other mechanical properties of rocks and also to further study the characteristics of the deformation rate analysis curve. The results of the modelling work may provide assistance for a more accurate interpretation of deformation rate analysis curves.

[1]  L. Tunbridge,et al.  In-situ stress measurement in the Carnmenellis granite—I. Overcoring tests at South Crofty mine at a depth of 790 m , 1983 .

[2]  S. P. Barr,et al.  Anelastic Strain Recovery and The Kaiser Effect Retention Span in the Carnmenellis Granite, U.K. , 1999 .

[3]  P. A. Cundall,et al.  Discrete Particle and Laboratory Modelling of Core Mechanics , 2000 .

[4]  Sijing Wang,et al.  A new approach to estimating geo-stresses from laboratory Kaiser effect measurements , 1999 .

[5]  C. Evans,et al.  Pore pressure as an explanation of complex anelastic strain recovery results , 1995 .

[6]  J. P. Henry,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale , 1997 .

[7]  R. P. Young,et al.  Simulating acoustic emissions in bonded-particle models of rock , 2000 .

[8]  Xu Jiang,et al.  A new method of determining geostresses by the acoustic emission Kaiser effect , 2000 .

[9]  K. Bonjer,et al.  The stress field in the Rhine Graben area inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms and estimation of frictional parameters , 1997 .

[10]  H. Reginald Hardy,et al.  Acoustic emission/microseismic activity in geologic structures and materials : proceedings of the sixth conference, held at the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, June 11-13, 1996 , 1998 .

[11]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Use of Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostics to Optimize Fracturing Jobs in the Arcabuz-Culebra Field , 2000 .

[12]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[13]  V. S. Vutukuri,et al.  In situ stress determination by acoustic emission technique , 1997 .

[14]  Tomowo Hirasawa,et al.  Deformation rate analysis : a new method for in situ stress estimation from inelastic deformation of rock samples under uni-axial compressions , 1990 .

[15]  Scott D. Reynolds,et al.  In situ stress field of eastern Australia , 1999 .

[16]  J. L. Ratigan,et al.  The use of the fracture reopening pressure in hydraulic fracturing stress measurements , 1992 .