What determines urban households' willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: A contingent valuation survey

This paper explores Turkish urban households' willingness to pay (WTP) for CO2 emission reductions expected to result from improvements in power production. A face-to-face questionnaire, with a Contingent valuation (CV) module prepared using the double-bounded dichotomous choice elicitation framework, was administered to 2422 respondents representative of urban Turkey--a developing country with low but rapidly increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The determinants of WTP were identified by considering not only the impact of standard socio-economic factors but also the effects of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour, the relevance of the identity of the collection agent (national versus international institutions) in terms of trust people have towards them, and the degree of perceived participation of others in the realization of the project. Our study confirms the existing literature in demonstrating that WTP figures reported by young and educated people that are active on environmental issues, and who also possess material security and environmental knowledge, are more likely to be high. However, their willingness to make contributions is hampered significantly by their belief that their fellow citizens will not contribute and the general lack of trust in institutions. Overall, this study may be taken as a call to eliminate governance-related uncertainties in climate change deals.

[1]  F. Adaman,et al.  On Environmental Concern, Willingness to Pay, and Postmaterialist Values , 2001 .

[2]  Alberto Longo,et al.  The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[3]  Keiko Aoki.  Do Consumers Select Food Products Based on Carbonddioxide Emissions? Evidence from a Buying Experiment in Japan , 2009 .

[4]  B. Roe.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[5]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .

[6]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques , 2002 .

[7]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles , 2002 .

[8]  David Herlihy,et al.  The Great Transformation ? , 2007 .

[9]  Arild Vatn,et al.  Institutions And The Environment , 2005 .

[10]  H. Sandvik.  Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth , 2008 .

[11]  Nihan Karali,et al.  CO2, GDP and RET: An aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey , 2008 .

[12]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[13]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[14]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation , 2003 .

[15]  Gökhan Ȫzertan,et al.  Impacts of the Tax System on Poverty and Social Exclusion: A Case Study on Turkey , 2008, New Perspectives on Turkey.

[16]  K. Norgaard.  “We Don't Really Want to Know” , 2006 .

[17]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Individual Option Prices for Climate Change Mitigation , 2002 .

[18]  I. Bateman,et al.  Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies , 2000 .

[19]  Zhishi Wang,et al.  Valuing black-faced spoonbill conservation in Macao: A policy and contingent valuation study , 2008 .

[20]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain , 2002 .

[21]  Jouni Paavola,et al.  Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization , 2007 .

[22]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Consumers’ Attributions of Proenvironmental Behavior, Motivation, and Ability to Self and Others , 1998 .

[23]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[24]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change , 2009 .

[25]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies , 2008 .

[26]  Carsten Schroeder,et al.  Altruism, Warm Glow and the Willingness-to-Donate for Green Electricity: An Artefactual Field Experiment , 2005 .

[27]  D. Pearce.  The Social Cost of Carbon and its Policy Implications , 2003 .

[28]  A. Gore.  An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , 2006 .

[29]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions , 1984 .

[30]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[31]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[32]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[33]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[34]  E. Jane Luzar,et al.  Willingness to pay or intention to pay: The attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation , 1998 .

[35]  L. Venkatachalam.  The contingent valuation method: a review , 2004 .

[36]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer , 2004 .

[37]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[38]  David J. Bjornstad,et al.  The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs. , 1996 .

[39]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Handbook on Contingent Valuation , 2009 .

[40]  D. Petrolia,et al.  Do Americans Want Ethanol? A Comparative Contingent-Valuation Study of Willingness to Pay for E-10 and E-85 , 2008 .

[41]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  Alternatives for Environmental Valuation , 2004 .

[42]  Tanya O’Garra,et al.  Is the public willing to pay for hydrogen buses? A comparative study of preferences in four cities , 2007 .

[43]  S. Ciriacy-Wantrup,et al.  Capital Returns from Soil-Conservation Practices , 1947 .

[44]  M. Arsel,et al.  Globalization, Development and Environmental Policies in Turkey , 2010 .

[45]  K. Remoundou,et al.  Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution , 2012 .

[46]  C. Spash.  Contingent Valuation Design and Data Treatment: If You Can't Shoot the Messenger, Change the Message , 2008 .

[47]  Nicholas Stern.  A Blueprint for a Safer Planet: How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progress and Prosperity , 2009 .

[48]  G. O’Brien.  A Blueprint for a Safer Planet: How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progress and Prosperity , 2012 .

[49]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Incentives , 2002, Land Economics.