Organizational Learning for the Incident Management Process: Lessons from High Reliability Organizations

Mainstream organizations typically struggle in their quest to combine effectiveness with efficiency, or reliability with flexibility. Experimentation and trial-and-error are regarded as important processes for organizational learning, but do not always lead to an organizational-wide optimum in terms of efficiency. Certain organizations, so-called High Reliability Organizations (HROs), exist that operate in hazardous environments but manage to structure themselves to be efficient and stay highly reliable. These organizations in high-tension industries are deprived from the luxury of going through trialand-error learning, but we state that exactly this is accountable for the HROs’ success. Through a case study of the IT Incident Management process at a large European financial services provider, we investigate how people involved in a process of such a mainstream organization, where reliability is of great concern, can learn from HROs to achieve a greater reliability while working efficiently. It appears that the characteristics that make an HRO distinct from other organizations are – at least to some extent – present in the IT Incident Management process. Our main conclusion however is that considerable opportunities remain unseized to lift the HRO qualities to a still higher level.

[1]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[2]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[3]  Howard Margolis,et al.  Dealing with risk , 1996 .

[4]  K. Roberts,et al.  Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations , 2001 .

[5]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[6]  M. Agar Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[7]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  B. Nooteboom Cost, quality and learning based governance of transactions: Western, Japanese and a third way , 1995 .

[9]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[10]  Jerker Denrell Organizational Adaptation and Loose Coupling , 2001 .

[11]  M. Endsley The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making , 1997 .

[12]  Timothy J. Vogus,et al.  Structuring for High Reliability: HR Practices and Mindful Processes in Reliability-Seeking Organizations , 2003 .

[13]  Anne-Françoise Rutkowski,et al.  The Effect of Group Support Systems on the Emergence of Unique Information in a Risk Management Process: A Field Study , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[14]  K. Roberts,et al.  From bhopal to banking: Organizational design can mitigate risk , 1993 .

[15]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[16]  Anne-Françoise Rutkowski,et al.  Dealing with Risk in Incident Management: An Application of High Reliability Theory , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[17]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Self-Designing High-Reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea , 1987 .

[18]  K. Weick Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[19]  Jianzhong Hong,et al.  CO-EVOLUTION OF KNOWLEDGE AND COMPETENCE MANAGEMENT AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS , 2004 .

[20]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[21]  David L. Cooke,et al.  Learning from Incidents , 2003 .

[22]  Frederick Wolf,et al.  OPERATIONALIZING AND TESTING NORMAL ACCIDENT THEORY IN PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS AND REFINERIES , 2009 .

[23]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[24]  K. Roberts Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[25]  K. Aase,et al.  Organisational knowledge in high-risk industries: supplementing model-based learning approaches , 2005 .

[26]  B. A. van de Walle,et al.  Combining flexibility and reliability for mainstream organizational learning , 2004 .