Vision in 3D Environments: Representing, perceiving, and remembering the shape of visual space

Humans constantly engage in automatic and rapid analysis of spatial scene structure when navigating an environment or searching for objects. This chapter draws on current research from computational, behavioral and neuroscience perspectives aimed at understanding how the human brain perceives, represents, and remembers the shape of space. Space can be described with both structural descriptions, which reflect layout of surfaces in the physical world, and semantic descriptions, which incorporate an observers understanding of the environment. We first review two formal approaches which can quantify the structural properties of scene layout: the isovist representation and the spatial envelope representation. Next we explore how space is experienced by observers, by reviewing behavioral results in which different factors distort the perceived space away from a veridical representation. Finally, we examine how representations of specific views of space are maintained in memory, and discuss potential neural mechanisms involved in integrating views into larger environments. Gaining a formal understanding of how geometric aspects of space map onto human perceptual, cognitive, and neural systems will help to create efficient functional spaces for our daily interactions with the world.

[1]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Perceiving Architectural Space: From Optic Arrays to lsovists , 2013 .

[2]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Estimating perception of scene layout properties from global image features. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Carlee Beth Hawkins,et al.  Perspective-taking changes perceived spatial layout , 2010 .

[6]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Perceived size is affected by blur and accommodation , 2010 .

[7]  William H. Warren,et al.  Wormholes in Virtual Reality: What spatial knowledge is learned for navigation? , 2010 .

[8]  William H. Warren,et al.  Rips and folds in virtual space: Ordinal violations in human spatial knowledge , 2010 .

[9]  A. Oliva,et al.  Normative representation of objects and scenes: Evidence from predictable biases in visual perception and memory , 2010 .

[10]  William H. Warren,et al.  Wormholes in virtual reality and the geometry of cognitive maps , 2010 .

[11]  E. Maguire,et al.  What does the retrosplenial cortex do? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Soojin Park,et al.  Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  John W Philbeck,et al.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population , 2009, Psychological research.

[15]  Pernille Hemmer,et al.  A Bayesian Account of Reconstructive Memory , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Christopher A. Dickinson,et al.  False Memory 1/20th of a Second Later , 2008, Psychological science.

[17]  Russell A. Epstein Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Social Support and the Perception of Geographical Slant. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[19]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Kathleen A. Turano,et al.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: Peripheral field loss compresses representations of space , 2007, Vision Research.

[21]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Where Am I Now? Distinct Roles for Parahippocampal and Retrosplenial Cortices in Place Recognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Intraub,et al.  Beyond the Edges of a View: Boundary Extension in Human Scene-Selective Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[23]  S. Becker,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. , 2007, Psychological review.

[24]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[25]  Talia Konkle,et al.  Normative Representation of Objects: Evidence for an Ecological Bias in Object Perception and Memory , 2007 .

[26]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Helene Intraub,et al.  More than meets the eye: The effect of planned fixations on scene representation , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Karen K. Daniels,et al.  The shape of a view: Are rectilinear views necessary to elicit boundary extension? , 2006 .

[29]  J. Lappin,et al.  Environmental context influences visually perceived distance , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Importing perceived features into false memories , 2006, Memory.

[32]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[34]  José Antonio Aznar-Casanova,et al.  [On the metric of visual space]. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[35]  M. Ernst,et al.  Focus cues affect perceived depth. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[36]  H. Hecht,et al.  Boundary extension: the role of magnification, object size, context, and binocular information. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[38]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Enclosure and Safety in Urbanscapes , 2005 .

[39]  Nicholas J. Wade amp Verstraten,et al.  Accommodating the past: A selective history of adaptation , 2005 .

[40]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  The Effects of Scene Category and Content on Boundary Extension - eScholarship , 2005 .

[41]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[42]  Helga C. Arsenio,et al.  Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Jan Malte Wiener,et al.  Isovists as a Means to Predict Spatial Experience and Behavior , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[44]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[48]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002, Nature.

[49]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information , 2004, Nature.

[50]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[51]  Harald Merckelbach,et al.  How children remember neutral and emotional pictures: boundary extension in children's scene memories. , 2004, The American journal of psychology.

[52]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Viewpoint-Specific Scene Representations in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[54]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[55]  Harald Merckelbach,et al.  Boundary distortions for neutral and emotional pictures , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Scene-Centered Description from Spatial Envelope Properties , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[57]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Depth Estimation from Image Structure , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[58]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Blobworld: Image Segmentation Using Expectation-Maximization and Its Application to Image Querying , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[59]  J. Seamon,et al.  Misremembering pictured objects: people of all ages demonstrate the boundary extension illusion. , 2002, The American journal of psychology.

[60]  John A. King,et al.  Memory for events and their spatial context: models and experiments. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Learning the semantics of words and pictures , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[62]  E. Maguire The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[63]  Sophia Psarra,et al.  Describing Shape and Shape Complexity Using Local Properties , 2001 .

[64]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[65]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[66]  Harvey S. Hecht,et al.  Perceiving pictures : An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space , 2001 .

[67]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[69]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[70]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[71]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Seeing Big Things: Overestimation of Heights is Greater for Real Objects Than for Objects in Pictures , 1999, Perception.

[74]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Creating false memories for visual scenes , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[75]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[76]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Visual Perception of Location and Distance , 1996 .

[77]  A. Higashiyama Horizontal and vertical distance perception: The discorded-orientation theory , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Perceiving geographical slant , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[79]  Lou Michel,et al.  Light: The Shape of Space: Designing with Space and Light , 1995 .

[80]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[81]  H Intraub,et al.  Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  T Indow,et al.  A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. , 1991, Psychological review.

[84]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual memory and the perception of a stable visual environment , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[85]  H. Intraub,et al.  Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays , 1986 .

[87]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[88]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[89]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? , 1982 .

[90]  J. Beck Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[91]  J. O’Keefe A review of the hippocampal place cells , 1979, Progress in Neurobiology.

[92]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[93]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[94]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[95]  tephen E. Palmer The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[96]  W. D. Wright Optics Painting and Photography , 1971 .

[97]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Optics Painting and Photography , 1970 .

[98]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .