Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological Constraints on Formal Theories of Dialogue

We are interested in the validation of a cognitive theory of human communication, grounded in a speech acts perspective. The theory we refer to is outlined, and a number of predictions are drawn from it. We report a series of protocols administered to 13 brain-injured subjects and to a comparable control group. The tasks included direct and indirect speech acts, irony, deceits, failures of communication, and theory of mind inferences. All the predicted trends of difficulty are consistently verified; in particular, difficulty increases form direct/indirect speech acts to irony, from irony to deceits, and from deceits to failure recovery. This trend symmetrically shows both in the successful situation and in the failure situation. Further, failure situations prove more difficult to handle than the relevant successful situation. In sharp contrast with previous literature, there is no difference between the subjects' comprehension of direct and indirect speech acts. The results are discussed in the light of our theoretical approach.

[1]  Adult aphasia rehabilitation , 1996 .

[2]  H. Brownell,et al.  Discourse Ability and Brain Damage , 1990 .

[3]  Giovanni Guida,et al.  Computational models of natural language processing , 1984 .

[4]  H. H. Clark.  Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  N. Foldi,et al.  Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[6]  M. Colombetti,et al.  Planning and understanding speech acts by interpersonal games , 1984 .

[7]  D. Marr,et al.  Artificial Intelligence - A Personal View , 1976, Artif. Intell..

[8]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[9]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[10]  C. Penn,et al.  Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subject , 1990 .

[11]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  A Plan-Based Analysis of Indirect Speech Act , 1980, CL.

[12]  D. Premack,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  D. Premack.  “Gavagai!” or the future history of the animal language controversy , 1985, Cognition.

[14]  R. Kirk.  CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[15]  H. H. Clark.  Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[16]  R. Byrne,et al.  Machiavellian intelligence : social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans , 1990 .

[17]  Alan M. Leslie,et al.  Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism , 1992, Cognition.

[18]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1991, CL.

[19]  J. E. Creighton,et al.  The Philosophical Review , 1901 .

[20]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[21]  John R. Searle,et al.  Expression and Meaning: Indirect speech acts , 1979 .

[22]  Irene Santini de Sigel,et al.  Communication and Cognition , 1998 .

[23]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  木村 和夫.  Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[25]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[26]  Donald Michie,et al.  Machine Intelligence 4 , 1970 .

[27]  C. Penn,et al.  Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients. , 1988, Brain injury.

[28]  J. Nespoulous,et al.  Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers , 1986, Brain and Language.

[29]  E. B. Page.  Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear Ranks , 1963 .

[30]  J. McGrath,et al.  The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. , 1997 .

[31]  B. Pentland,et al.  Developing rehabilitation services for the head injured: a UK perspective. , 1987, Brain injury.

[32]  Da Wei Liu Yi Si,et al.  Convention A Philosophical Study , 1991 .

[33]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and representations , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  J. Perner.  Understanding the Representational Mind , 1993 .

[36]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Planning English Sentences , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  S. McDonald.  Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[38]  Mental states in communication , 1997 .

[39]  Carlo Semenza.  Generating proper names: a case of selective inability , 1996 .

[40]  Pragmatics and Education , 1986 .

[41]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Pragmatic Aspects of Communication in Brain-Damaged Patients**We wish to acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke (M 11408), the Veterans Administration and Harvard Project Zero. , 1983 .

[42]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[43]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[44]  Evelyn J White,et al.  Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia , 1984 .

[45]  Territoire Urbain,et al.  Convention , 1955, Hidden Nature.

[46]  John McCarthy,et al.  SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .

[47]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[48]  William Hirst,et al.  Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology , 1984, Brain and Language.

[49]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[50]  B. Bower.  A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[51]  R. Byrne,et al.  Why creative intelligence is hard to find , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[52]  John McCarthy,et al.  Circumscription - A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[53]  J. Morton,et al.  The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: autism , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Planning Perlocutionary Acts , 1983, IJCAI.

[55]  Roland Hausser,et al.  Principles of Pragmatics , 1989 .

[56]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[57]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Speech Acts and Rationality , 1985, ACL.

[58]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit , 1987 .

[59]  S. McDonald.  Pragmatic Language Skills after Closed Head Injury: Ability to Meet the Informational Needs of the Listener , 1993, Brain and Language.

[60]  A. Holland.  Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[61]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[62]  P. Strawson.  Intention and Convention in Speech Acts , 1964 .

[63]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[64]  B. Stemmer.  A Pragmatic Approach to Neurolinguistics: Requests (Re)Considered , 1994, Brain and Language.

[65]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication. , 1992 .

[66]  L. Leonard,et al.  Aphasics' comprehension of contextually conveyed meaning , 1978, Brain and Language.

[67]  M. N. Metz,et al.  Discourse ability and brain damage. Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Joanette Y, Brownell HH. Springer-Verlag, New York (1989), 370 p , 1990 .

[68]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Nonverbal communication and aphasia: A review I. Comprehension , 1982, Brain and Language.

[69]  Giovanni Guida,et al.  Competence and performance in the design of natural language systems , 1984 .

[70]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1992, Language.

[71]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Confirmations and Joint Action , 1991, IJCAI.

[72]  Marco Colombetti.  Formal Semantics for Mutual Belief , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[73]  P. Sommers,et al.  Pragmatic language skills alter closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests , 1993 .

[74]  M. González.  Politeness: some universals in language usage , 1995 .

[75]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Mindblindness. An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind Simon Baron-Cohen 1995 , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[76]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Analyzing Intention in Utterances , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[77]  Gilbert Harman,et al.  Linguistic behaviour (review) , 2015 .

[78]  Knowledge for communication , 1989 .

[79]  R. Chapey,et al.  Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia , 1981 .

[80]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[81]  François Récanati,et al.  The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[83]  C. Penn.  Compensation and language recovery in the chronic aphasic patient , 1987 .

[84]  R. D. Bleser.  The Communicative Impact of Non-Fluent Aphasia on the Dialog Behavior of Linguistically Unimpaired Partners , 1986 .

[85]  M. Wilcox,et al.  Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics , 1985 .

[86]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Logic for Default Reasoning , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[87]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading , 2015 .

[88]  A. Leslie.  Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." , 1987 .

[89]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Is Cognitive Neuropsychology Plausible? The Perils of Sitting on a One-Legged Stool , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[90]  D. Olson,et al.  Developing theories of mind , 1988 .

[91]  A. Guilford,et al.  Pragmatic functions in aphasia. , 1982, Journal of communication disorders.

[92]  M. Colombetti,et al.  Failures, exploitations and deceits in communication , 1993 .

[93]  A. Leslie.  Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM , 1994, Cognition.

[94]  C. Semenza,et al.  Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressions , 1989, Nature.

[95]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[96]  A. Whiten,et al.  Primate Calls, Human Language, and Nonverbal Communication [and Comments and Reply] , 1993, Current Anthropology.

[97]  David Lewis.  Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[98]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue , 1989 .

[99]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[100]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[101]  M. Colombetti,et al.  Conversation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue , 1993 .

[102]  S. Segalowitz.  Language functions and brain organization , 1983 .