The Structural Role of Feed-Forward Loop Motif in Transcriptional Regulatory Networks

We present multiple approaches to identify the significance of topological metrics that contribute to biological network robustness. We examine and compare the communication efficiency of transcriptional networks extracted from the bacterium Escherichia coli and the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using discrete event simulation based in silico experiments. The packet receipt rate is used as a dynamical metric to understand information flow, while unsupervised machine learning techniques are used to examine underlying relationships inherent to the network topology. To this effect, we defined sixteen features based on structural/topological significance, such as transcriptional motifs, and other traditional metrics, such as network density and average shortest path, among others. Support vector classification is used with these features after parameters were identified using a cross-validation grid-search method. Feature ranking is performed using analysis of variance F-value metric. We found that feed-forward loop (FFL) based features consistently show up as significant in both the bacterial and yeast networks, even at different noise levels. We then use a supervised machine learning technique (random forests) to investigate the structural prominence of the FFL motif in information transmission using subnetworks (larger sample size compared to the unsupervised approach) extracted from Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory network. Further, we study the role of FFLs in signal transduction within the complete Escherichia coli regulatory network. Although our work reveals a minimal role of FFLs in signal transduction, it highlights the structural role of FFLs in information transmission captured by random forest regression. This work paves the way to design specialized engineered systems, such as wireless sensor networks, that exploit topological properties of natural networks to attain maximum efficiency.

[1]  Preetam Ghosh,et al.  Feature ranking in transcriptional networks: Packet receipt as a dynamical metric , 2014, BICT.

[2]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[3]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Performance of wireless sensor topologies inspired by E. coli genetic networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[5]  E. Raineri,et al.  Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Preetam Ghosh,et al.  Motif Participation by Genes in E. coli Transcriptional Networks , 2012, Front. Physio..

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[8]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[9]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization , 2005, PLoS biology.

[12]  Samik Ghosh,et al.  GaMa: an evolutionary algorithmic approach for the design of mesh-based radio access networks , 2005, The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 30th Anniversary (LCN'05)l.

[13]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Preetam Ghosh,et al.  Dynamical impacts from structural redundancy of transcriptional motifs in gene-regulatory networks , 2014, BICT.

[16]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[17]  Marti A. Hearst Trends & Controversies: Support Vector Machines , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[18]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Leveraging the robustness of genetic networks: a case study on bio-inspired wireless sensor network topologies , 2014, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[19]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Principles of genomic robustness inspire fault-tolerant WSN topologies: A network science based case study , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[20]  Dario Floreano,et al.  GeneNetWeaver: in silico benchmark generation and performance profiling of network inference methods , 2011, Bioinform..

[21]  Uri Alon,et al.  Evolution of Bow-Tie Architectures in Biology , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..