Short reconstruction nail for intertrochanteric fracture: does it really fit Asian feature?

BackgroundThe Trigen short reconstruction trochanteric antegrade nail (TAN) is considered most suitable for the small skeletons of Asian patients. We have evaluated the results of TAN for intertrochanteric fractures in Asian patients.MethodsBetween January 2006 and March 2009, 174 fractures in 164 patients were treated by TAN in our department. Epidemiological data, radiological changes, fracture types, cortical bone indices, clinical outcomes, and complications over a mean of 26 months were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsWe observed a 17.0% fracture rate at the tip of the nail, a poor reduction rate of 15.9%, and a 41.4% cracking rate of the lateral trochanter for type 31-A3 fracture. Review of these cracking cases showed that they were all type 31-A3 unstable fractures combined with comminuted lateral trochanter fractures. Two shaft fractures required revision, with other fractures showing no delayed union, nonunion or infection. No screw breakage but one cut-out occurred, which received total hip arthroplasty revision. All other fractures healed at last. Risk of distal shaft fractures was not associated with patient age, gender, fracture type or cortical bone index.ConclusionDespite the theoretically better design of TAN and the healing of most fractures and good activity at last follow-up, poor reduction and coxa vara caused by insertion of the nail could not be completely avoided, and the design of the distal part of the nail had the potential to cause femoral shaft fracture. Future improvements are necessary to enable the use of this system in Asians.

[1]  D. W. Lyddon The prevention of complications with the Gamma Locking Nail. , 1996, American journal of orthopedics.

[2]  P. Procter,et al.  Geometric Mismatch of the Gamma Nail to the Chinese Femur , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  G. Taglang,et al.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[5]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Geographic variation in device use for intertrochanteric hip fractures. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  A. Patel,et al.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  D. Clawson,et al.  Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. 1984. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  C. van der Werken,et al.  The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. , 1999, Injury.

[9]  Lyddon Dw The prevention of complications with the Gamma Locking Nail. , 1996 .

[10]  A. Gächter,et al.  Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  Hao-bo Wu,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous compression plating and short reconstruction nail for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture , 2011, Orthopaedic surgery.

[12]  D. Geng,et al.  Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail. , 2010, Injury.

[13]  A. Patel,et al.  A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA NAIL AND THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW , 1991 .

[14]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  Won Yong Shon,et al.  Mismatch between PFNa and medullary canal causing difficulty in nailing of the pertrochanteric fractures , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[16]  B. Geulette,et al.  Complications associated with gamma nailing. A review of 439 cases. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[17]  I. Schipper,et al.  RANDOMISED COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA NAIL AND THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL , 2004 .

[18]  Tain‐Hsiung Chen,et al.  Primary osteogenic sarcoma with pulmonary metastasis: clinical results and prognostic factors in 91 patients. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  Sigvard T. Hansen,et al.  Closed Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Fractures , 2001 .

[20]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  Shin-Yoon Kim,et al.  Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  F. Kummer,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  Lei Liu,et al.  Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[24]  G. Zafiropoulos,et al.  Fractured Gamma nail. , 1994, Injury.