The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods

Global trade and investment have become increasingly liberalized in recent decades. This liberalization has lately been accompanied by substantive new requirements for strong minimum standards of intellectual property (IP) protection, which moves the world economy toward harmonized private rights in knowledge goods. While this trend may have beneficial impacts in terms of innovation and technology diffusion, such impacts would not be evenly distributed across countries. Deep questions also arise about whether such globalization of rights to information will raise roadblocks to the national and international provision of such public goods as environmental protection, public health, education, and scientific advance. This article argues that the globalized IP regime will strongly affect prospects for technology transfer and competition in developing countries. In turn, these nations must determine how to implement such standards in a pro-competitive manner and foster innovation and competition in their own markets. Developing countries may need to take the lead in policy experimentation and IP innovation in order to offset overly protectionist tendencies in the rich countries and to maintain the supply of global public goods in an emerging transnational system of innovation. Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

[1]  M. Panizzon,et al.  Legal Perspectives On Traditional Knowledge: The Case For Intellectual Property Protection , 2004 .

[2]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[3]  Paul F. Uhlir,et al.  The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain , 2003 .

[4]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[5]  P. Samuelson,et al.  The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering , 2002 .

[6]  C. Correa The Trips Agreement and Developing Countries , 2005 .

[7]  Pamela J. D. Smith How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? , 2001 .

[8]  R. Eisenberg,et al.  Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine , 2002, American Scientist.

[9]  J. Reichman From Free Riders to Fair Followers: Global Competition Under the TRIPS Agreement , 1996 .

[10]  Robert M. Sherwood Intellectual Property and Economic Development , 1990 .

[11]  Ken Garber Patently absurd? , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection Under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement , 1995 .

[13]  P. Samuelson Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities , 2003 .

[14]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Political Economy of Public Science , 1999 .

[15]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[16]  Paul A. David,et al.  A TRAGEDY OF THE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE ‘COMMONS’? Global Science, Intellectual Property and the Digital Technology Boomerang , 2005 .

[17]  Jacqueline D. Lipton Balancing Private Rights and Public Policies: Reconceptualizing Property in Databases , 2003 .

[18]  D. Matthews WTO DECISION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE DOHA DECLARATION ON THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH: A SOLUTION TO THE ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES PROBLEM? , 2004 .

[19]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms , 1994 .

[20]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform , 1999 .

[21]  C. Correa,et al.  CAN THE TRIPS AGREEMENT FOSTER TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2003 .

[22]  Francisc Marius Keeley-Domokos State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. , 1999 .

[23]  Jonathan A. Franklin,et al.  Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information , 1999 .

[24]  Frederick M. Abbott The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO , 2002 .

[25]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[26]  J. F. Duffy Harmony and Diversity in Global Patent Law , 2002 .

[27]  Frederick M. Abbott The Future of IPRs in the Multilateral Trading System , 2003 .

[28]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Charting the Collapse of the Patent-Copyright Dichotomy: Premises for a Restructured International Intellectual Property System , 1995 .

[29]  Suzanne Scotchmer The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Treaties , 2001 .

[30]  Ignatius J. Horstmann,et al.  Licensing versus Direct Investment: A Model of Internalization by the Multinational Enterprise , 1987 .

[31]  Yochai Benkler Through the Looking Glass: Alice and the Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[32]  Richard A Epstein,et al.  Steady the course: property rights in genetic material. , 2003, Advances in genetics.

[33]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation , 2000 .

[34]  K. Maskus Regulatory standards in the WTO: Comparing intellectual property rights with competition policy, environmental protection, and core labor standards , 2002, World Trade Review.

[35]  Reaping What You Sow: An Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization , 2001 .

[36]  P. David,et al.  Towards Institutional Infrastructures for e-Science: The Scope of the Challenge , 2003 .

[37]  Graeme Dinwoodie A New Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms , 2000 .

[38]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[39]  Janusz A. Ordover,et al.  A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion , 1991 .

[40]  P. Uhlir,et al.  A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment , 2003 .

[41]  Gerrit De Geest,et al.  The international library of critical writings in economics , 2004 .

[42]  J. Reichman Intellectual Property in International Trade: Opportunities and Risks of a GATT Connection , 1989 .

[43]  Jerome H. Reichman,et al.  Using Liability Rules to Stimulate Local Innovation in Developing Countries: Application to Traditional Knowledge , 2005 .

[44]  Phillip McCalman Reaping What You Sow: An Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization , 1999 .

[45]  Paul A. David Will Building ‘Good Fences’ Really Make ‘Good Neighbors’ in Science? , 2001 .

[46]  Ruth L. Okediji Public Welfare and the Role of the WTO: Reconsidering the TRIPs Agreement , 2003 .

[47]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[48]  U. Simonis,et al.  Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[49]  Paul F. Uhlir,et al.  Conflicting International Public Sector Information Policies and their Effects on the Public Domain and the Economy , 2003 .

[50]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.