Output‐Only Identification and Model Updating by Dynamic Testing in Unfavorable Conditions of a Seismically Damaged Building

Knowledge of the dynamic behavior of complex buildings subjected to near-fault earthquakes may be enriched by valuable information obtained through rapid onsite dynamic testing to aid in the design of appropriate retrofitting interventions. Through a case study, the article demonstrates the enhancement in comprehension of the structural behavior obtained by means of a 2-day testing campaign conducted on a complex building of the Engineering Faculty, Edifice A, which was heavily damaged in the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. The onsite testing was carried out with a network of 13 accelerometers opportunely located to identify the dynamic characteristics of the structure by means of ambient noise-induced vibration. Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) and Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) output-only procedures were both used to identify the main modal parameters of two substructures of the building. The modal characteristics were used to update a finite element model representing small amplitude vibrations of the damaged structures. The direct comparison of the identified modal features with finite element models, in which damaged member locations are determined by onsite visual observations, has permitted identification of a model representative of the structural behavior of the building in the immediate postearthquake conditions.

[1]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Damping performance of two simple oscillators coupled by a visco-elastic connection , 2013 .

[2]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Modelling of sprayer boom dynamics by means of maximum likelihood identification techniques, part 1: A comparison of input-output and output-only modal testing , 2003 .

[3]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Structural performance of the historic and modern buildings of the University of L’Aquila during the seismic events of April 2009☆ , 2010 .

[4]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[5]  Roger Ghanem,et al.  A novel approach for the structural identification and monitoring of a full-scale 17-story building based on ambient vibration measurements , 2008 .

[6]  Alessandro De Stefano,et al.  Comparative study of vibration‐based parametric identification techniques for a three‐dimensional frame structure , 2012 .

[7]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Seismic protection of frame structures via semi-active control: modeling and implementation issues , 2009 .

[8]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[9]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Application of Observability Techniques to Structural System Identification , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Cable–deck dynamic interactions at the International Guadiana Bridge: On‐site measurements and finite element modelling , 2006 .

[11]  Zu-Qing Qu,et al.  Model Order Reduction Techniques , 2004 .

[12]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating Using Evolutionary Strategy for Damage Detection , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[13]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[14]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Swinging-bell resonances and their cancellation identified by dynamical testing in a modern bell tower , 2009 .

[15]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[16]  Nicola Ivan Giannoccaro,et al.  Ambient vibration testing, dynamic identification and model updating of a historic tower , 2012 .

[17]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings , 2003 .

[18]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[19]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Structural-System Identification. I: Theory , 1995 .

[20]  D. Giraldo,et al.  Modal Identification through Ambient Vibration: Comparative Study , 2009 .

[21]  Ahmet Turer,et al.  Structural Identification: Analytical Aspects , 1998 .

[22]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Fundamentals of system identification in structural dynamics , 1989 .

[23]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[24]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Modal analysis identification techniques , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Serviceability and Damage Scenario in Irregular RC Structures: Post-Earthquake Observations and Modeling Predictions , 2013 .

[26]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Robust output-only modal identification and monitoring of buildings in the presence of dynamic interactions for rapid post-earthquake emergency management , 2012 .

[27]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Dynamic Wavelet Neural Network for Nonlinear Identification of Highrise Buildings , 2005 .

[28]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  Hybrid Time‐Frequency Blind Source Separation Towards Ambient System Identification of Structures , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  Dora Foti,et al.  Dynamic investigation of an ancient masonry bell tower with operational modal analysis: a non-destructive experimental technique to obtain the dynamic characteristics of a structure , 2012 .

[30]  Fabrizio Vestroni,et al.  Identification of finite element models in structural dynamics , 1993 .

[31]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Spectral and modal parameter estimation from output-only measurements , 1995 .