Amplification of erbB2 and erbB2 expression are superior to estrogen receptor status as risk factors for distant recurrence in pT1N0M0 breast cancer: a nationwide population-based study.

PURPOSE To assess the relative importance of 10 prognostic factors in pT1N0M0 breast cancer (< or =2 cm in diameter, node negative). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Women diagnosed with breast cancer in Finland from 1991 to 1992 were identified from the files of the Finnish Cancer Registry, and individual clinicopathological data were collected from the hospital case records of women living in five regions comprising about one-half of the Finnish population. Of the women with minimum required information available (n = 2842), 852 had unilateral pT(1)N(0)M(0) cancer. The median follow-up time was 9.5 years, and only 5% had received systemic adjuvant therapy. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, erbB2, p53, and Ki-67 expression was determined from tumor tissue microarrays using immunohistochemistry, and the erbB2 (HER-2) amplification status was determined using chromogenic in situ hybridization. RESULTS Primary tumor size < or =5 mm and histological grade 1 were associated with 100 and 95% (95% confidence interval, 92-98%) 9-year distant disease-free survival, respectively, whereas strong erbB2 expression or the presence of >20% Ki-67-positive cells was associated with >20% risk. ER and progesterone receptor values obtained from the hospital case records or tumor microarrays showed weaker association with outcome than the erbB2 status. Small (< or =10 mm) erbB2-negative cancers were associated with >90% 9-year distant disease-free survival, irrespective of histological grade. CONCLUSIONS Prognosis of pT(1)N(0)M(0) breast cancer is generally well defined by the histological grade and primary tumor size. The erbB2 status was superior to ER as a prognostic factor in these tumors.

[1]  Predicting response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer: a hypothesis. , 1976, Science.

[2]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Prognostic factors for patients with breast cancers 1cm and smaller. , 1998 .

[3]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[4]  T. Dimpfl,et al.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Joensuu,et al.  Comparison of breast carcinomas diagnosed in the 1980s with those diagnosed in the 1940s to 1960s. , 1991, BMJ.

[6]  R. W. Scarff,et al.  Histological typing of breast tumors. , 1982, Tumori.

[7]  J. Kononen,et al.  Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[8]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Correlation of tumor size and axillary lymph node involvement with prognosis in patients with T1 breast carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  C. Benz,et al.  Prognostic and predictive significance of ErbB-2 breast tumor levels measured by enzyme immunoassay. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. R. Shetty The new era in breast cancer. , 1996, Archives of surgery.

[11]  L. Norton,et al.  Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  R. Hutter,et al.  Predictors of recurrence for patients with small (one centimeter or less) localized breast cancer (T 1 a,b NO MO) , 1995 .

[13]  D. Hayes,et al.  When is a tumor marker ready for prime time? A case study of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. G. Schuler,et al.  The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. , 1996, Archives of surgery.

[15]  D. Larsimont,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a practical alternative for fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival breast cancer samples. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  H. Joensuu,et al.  Late mortality from pT1N0M0 breast carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[17]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[18]  D. Rimm,et al.  Validation of Tissue Microarray Technology in Breast Carcinoma , 2000, Laboratory Investigation.