Operationalising Value Based Pricing of Medicines: A Taxonomy of Approaches

The purpose of this paper is to provide an account of the full set of possible means by which value based pricing (VBP) might be operationalised; to describe and categorise them by developing a taxonomy of approaches; to give an initial assessment of the challenges, pros and cons that each of the principal types of approach implies. To achieve this, we review the elements of value that could be taken into account, how they might be measured and valued, how the different elements could be combined into an overall assessment of a medicine’s value, and how that then could be linked to the maximum price the health service is willing to reimburse.The UK Department of Health’s consultation document regarding the introduction of VBP (DH, 2010a) outlines one possible approach to these steps – but others are possible. We begin with a brief discussion of value in economics and theoretical frameworks from economics relevant to the normative question of which attributes of medicines should be taken into account in VBP. We proceed to outline a taxonomy of approaches to VBP, taking as our starting point that VBP will include a measure of health gain and that this will be built on the QALY. Our principal interest is in the way criteria other than QALYs are taken into account. We set out to: (i) identify and describe the full range of alternative means by which “value” might be measured and valued, (ii) identify and describe the options available for aggregating the different components of value to establish a maximum price, and (iii) note the challenges and relative advantages associated with these approaches. Finally, we review the means by which VBP is currently operationalised in a selection of countries and place these, and proposals for the UK, in the context of our taxonomy.

[1]  R. Fleming Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS , 2010 .

[2]  Shepley Orr,et al.  What Values Should Count in HTA for New Medicines under Value Based Pricing in the UK , 2011 .

[3]  Andrew Briggs,et al.  Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  N. Devlin,et al.  QA4 IS THE AIM OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM TO MAXIMISE QALYS? AN INVESTIGATION OF ‘WHAT ELSE MATTERS’ IN THE NHS , 2011 .

[5]  Jing Jing Li,et al.  The Role of Value for Money in Public Insurance Coverage Decisions for Drugs in Australia: A Retrospective Analysis 1994-2004 , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  N. Devlin,et al.  An Analysis of NICE’s ‘Restricted’ (or ‘Optimized’) Decisions , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[7]  A. Towse If it ain't broke, don't price fix it: the OFT and the PPRS. , 2007, Health economics.

[8]  A. Culyer THE NORMATIVE ECONOMICS OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE AND PROVISION , 1989 .

[9]  M. Grossman On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health , 1972, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  D. Meltzer,et al.  Accounting for Future Costs in Medical Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 1997, Journal of health economics.

[11]  N. Devlin The Economics of a ‘Liberated’ NHS , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[12]  David Barnett,et al.  Pharmacoeconomics: NICE's approach to decision-making. , 2010, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[13]  A. Culyer,et al.  Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. , 2008, Journal of health economics.

[14]  A. Garber,et al.  Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1997, Journal of health economics.

[15]  Paul Hansen,et al.  Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights? , 2011, Health policy.

[16]  The additive utility assumption of the QALY model revisited. , 2010, Journal of health economics.

[17]  A. Culyer Deliberative Processes in Decisions About Health Care Technologies: Combining Different Types of Evidence, Values, Algorithms and People , 2009 .

[18]  J. Sussex Innovation in Medicines: Can We Value Progress? , 2010 .

[19]  N. Devlin,et al.  Incorporating Multiple Criteria in HTA: Methods and Processes , 2011 .

[20]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.

[21]  Thomas Müller-Bohn,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2015 .

[22]  N. Devlin,et al.  Funding fertility: Issues in the allocation and distribution of resources to assisted reproduction technologies , 2003, Human fertility.

[23]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .