Functional and structural abnormalities in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Passive diastolic properties of the left ventricle were determined in 10 control subjects and 12 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Simultaneous left ventricular angiography and high fidelity pressure measurements were performed in all patients. Left ventricular chamber stiffness was calculated from left ventricular pressure-volume and myocardial stiffness from left ventricular stress-strain relations with use of a viscoelastic model. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were classified into two groups according to the diastolic constant of myocardial stiffness (beta). Group 1 consisted of seven patients with a normal constant of myocardial stiffness less than or equal to 9.6 (normal range 2.2 to 9.6) and group 2 of 5 patients with a beta greater than 9.6. Structural abnormalities (percent interstitial fibrosis, fibrous content) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were assessed by morphometry from right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies. Heart rate was similar in the three groups. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was significantly greater in patients with cardiomyopathy (18 mm Hg in group 1 and 22 mm Hg in group 2) than in the control patients (10 mm Hg). Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in groups 1 (37%) and 2 (36%) than in the control patients (66%). Left ventricular muscle mass index was significantly increased in both groups with cardiomyopathy. The constant of chamber stiffness (beta*) was slightly although not significantly greater in groups 1 and 2 (0.58 and 0.58, respectively) than in the control group (0.35). The constant of myocardial stiffness beta was normal in group 1 (7.0; control group 6.9, p = NS) but was significantly increased in group 2 (23.5). Interstitial fibrosis was 19% in group 1 and 43% (p less than 0.001) in group 2 (normal less than or equal to 10%). There was an exponential relation between both diastolic constant of myocardial stiffness (beta) and interstitial fibrosis (IF) (r = 0.95; p less than 0.001) and beta and fibrous content divided by end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.93; p less than 0.001). It is concluded that myocardial stiffness can be normal in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy despite severely depressed systolic function. Structural alterations of the myocardium with increased amounts of fibrous tissues are probably responsible for the observed changes in passive elastic properties of the myocardium in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. The constant of myocardial stiffness (beta) helps to identify patients with severe structural alterations (group 2), representing possibly a more advanced stage of the disease.

[1]  J. Willerson,et al.  Influence of Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of Cardiac Muscle , 1974, Circulation research.

[2]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Left ventricular compliance: mechanisms and clinical implications. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  M. Noble,et al.  Left Ventricular Filling and Diastolic Pressure‐Volume Relations in the Conscious Dog , 1969, Circulation research.

[4]  P. Ludbrook,et al.  Modification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Behavior by Isometric Handgrip Exercise , 1980, Circulation.

[5]  O. Hess,et al.  Diastolic Simple Elastic and Viscoelastic Properties of the Left Ventricle in Man , 1979, Circulation.

[6]  H Sandler,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. , 1966, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  S. Glantz,et al.  Factors which affect the diastolic pressure-volume curve. , 1978, Circulation research.

[8]  W J Keon,et al.  The relationship between pericardial pressure and right atrial pressure: an intraoperative study. , 1986, Circulation.

[9]  R. Magorien,et al.  Human myocardial histologic characteristics in congestive heart failure. , 1983, Circulation.

[10]  Y. Hirota,et al.  Functional and histopathologic correlation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: an integrated evaluation by multivariate analysis. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. MacKenzie,et al.  Control of heart rate during movement in acute myocardial infarction. , 1978, European journal of cardiology.

[12]  W. Schaper,et al.  Reduced Volume Fraction of Myofibrils in Myocardium of Patients with Decompensated Pressure Overload , 1981, Circulation.

[13]  E. Yellin,et al.  Diastolic viscous properties of the intact canine left ventricle. , 1979, Circulation research.

[14]  W Grossman,et al.  Alterations in left ventricular relaxation and diastolic compliance in congestive cardiomyopathy. , 1979, Cardiovascular research.

[15]  O. Hess,et al.  Diastolic stiffness and myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before and after valve replacement. , 1984, Circulation.

[16]  R. A. Johnson,et al.  Dilated cardiomyopathies of the adult (second of two parts). , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Carroll,et al.  Myocardial structure in patients with exercise-induced ischemia. , 1988, Circulation.

[18]  W. Proudfit,et al.  Primary myocardial disease. Correlation with clinical findings, angiographic and biopsy diagnosis. Follow-up of 139 patients. , 1980, American heart journal.

[19]  J. Goodwin The frontiers of cardiomyopathy. , 1982, British heart journal.

[20]  I. Mirsky,et al.  Assessment of passive elastic stiffness of cardiac muscle: mathematical concepts, physiologic and clinical considerations, directions of future research. , 1976, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[21]  E. Olsen,et al.  Critical analysis of endomyocardial biopsies from patients suspected of having cardiomyopathy. II: Comparison of histology and clinical/haemodynamic information. , 1981, British heart journal.

[22]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[23]  E. Sonnenblick,et al.  Assessment of Left Ventricular Stiffness in Primary Myocardial Disease and Coronary Artery Disease , 1974, Circulation.

[24]  Anderson,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the diastolic left ventricle in the conscious dog. , 1977, Circulation research.

[25]  B. Lewis,et al.  Current concepts of left ventricular relaxation and compliance. , 1980, American heart journal.

[26]  E. Olsen,et al.  Electron Microscopic Investigation of Endomyocardial Biopsy Samples in Hypertrophy and Cardiomyopathy: A Semiquantitative Study in 48 Patients , 1981, Circulation.

[27]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Diastolic properties of the left ventricle in normal adults and in patients with third heart sounds. , 1984, Circulation.

[28]  O. Hess,et al.  Diastolic Function and Myocardial Structure in Patients with Myocardial Hypertrophy: Special Reference to Normalized Viscoelastic Data , 1981, Circulation.

[29]  O. Hess,et al.  Diastolic filling dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis. , 1986, Circulation.

[30]  R. Weiss,et al.  MATERNAL SERUM-α-FETOPROTEIN AND LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT , 1978, The Lancet.

[31]  H. Dodge,et al.  A Method for Determining Left Ventricular Mass in Man , 1964, Circulation.

[32]  W. Gaasch,et al.  The influence of acute alterations in coronary blood flow on left ventricular diastolic compliance and wall thickness. , 1978, European journal of cardiology.

[33]  E. Sonnenblick,et al.  Influence of Right Ventricular Filling Pressure on Left Ventricular Pressure and Dimension , 1974, Circulation research.

[34]  I. Mirsky,et al.  Left ventricular stresses in the intact human heart. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[35]  J. Carroll,et al.  The differential effects of positive inotropic and vasodilator therapy on diastolic properties in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. , 1986, Circulation.

[36]  W. Kübler,et al.  Quantitative morphologic findings of the myocardium in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  G. Mudge,et al.  Factors Contributing to Altered Left Ventricular Diastolic Properties During Angina Pectoris , 1979, Circulation.

[38]  M. Kaltenbach,et al.  Correlations Between Clinical and Morphologic Findings and Natural History in Congestive Cardiomyopathy , 1978 .

[39]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Prognosis and possible presymptomatic manifestations of congestive cardiomyopathy (COCM). , 1978, Postgraduate medical journal.

[40]  O. Hess,et al.  [Left ventricular function in chronic pulmonary hypertension]. , 1977, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift.

[41]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Evaluation of myocardial function in cardiomyopathic states. , 1984, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[42]  W. Littler,et al.  Critical assessment of diagnostic value of endomyocardial biopsy. Assessment of cardiac biopsy. , 1978, British heart journal.

[43]  P. Richardson King's endomyocardial bioptome. , 1974, Lancet.

[44]  S A Glantz,et al.  Volume Loading Slows Left Ventricular Isovolumic Relaxation Rate , 1981, Circulation research.

[45]  E. Yellin,et al.  Left ventricular relaxation in the filling and nonfilling intact canine heart. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[46]  H. Figulla,et al.  Spontaneous hemodynamic improvement or stabilization and associated biopsy findings in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. , 1985, Circulation.

[47]  S. Glantz,et al.  A mechanism for shifts in the diastolic, left ventricular, pressure-volume curve: the role of the pericardium. , 1978, European journal of cardiology.

[48]  J. Carroll,et al.  Left ventricular relaxation in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to aortic valve disease. , 1982, Circulation.

[49]  J. Carroll,et al.  Exercise‐induced Ischemia: The Influence of Altered Relaxation on Early Diastolic Pressures , 1983, Circulation.

[50]  P G Hugenholtz,et al.  Determination of left ventricular wall thickness by angiocardiography. , 1969, American heart journal.

[51]  W. Roberts,et al.  Myocardial biopsy: a useful diagnostic procedure or only a research tool? , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[52]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Left Ventricular Stress and Compliance in Man: With Special Reference to Normalized Ventricular Function Curves , 1972, Circulation.