Reliability and validity of YRBS physical activity items among middle school students.

PURPOSE To assess test-retest reliability and validity of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) items for moderate and vigorous physical activity in middle school students. METHODS Students (N = 125; 12.7 +/- 0.6 yr) wore Actigraph accelerometers for 6.1 +/- 1.0 d and twice completed surveys that included YRBS moderate and vigorous physical activity items. Accelerometer counts were transformed into minutes of moderate (3-6 METs) and vigorous (> 6 METs) physical activity. Days per week meeting moderate and vigorous physical activity recommendations were estimated using four summary methods. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) from the two surveys. Validity was assessed as percent concordance, kappa coefficients, and sensitivity and specificity using binary YRBS and Actigraph outcomes. RESULTS Test-retest ICC for the moderate and vigorous physical activity items were 0.51 and 0.46, respectively. Twenty-two percent of students met the recommended level of moderate physical activity (>or= 30 min.d(-1), >or= 5 d.wk(-1)) according to self-reports, whereas 90.4 and 66.4% met the recommendation according to accumulated accelerometer minutes and 5-min-bout criteria, respectively. Concordance between YRBS and Actigraph moderate physical activity measures was highest using accumulated accelerometer minutes. Sensitivity of the moderate YRBS item ranged from 0.19 to 0.23 for four comparisons, and specificity was 0.74-0.92. More than two thirds of students reported vigorous physical activity at recommended levels (>or= 20 min.d(-1), >or= 3 d.wk(-1)), whereas the highest prevalence according to Actigraph monitoring was 22.4%. Sensitivity of the YRBS vigorous item was high (0.75-0.92) compared with the four Actigraph measures; specificity was low (0.23-0.26). CONCLUSION YRBS questions underestimate the proportion of students attaining recommended levels of moderate physical activity and overestimate the proportion meeting vigorous recommendations. Use of accelerometry for physical activity surveillance seems to be indicated. At the minimum, new questions demonstrating greater validity are needed.

[1]  K. Flegal,et al.  Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. , 1995, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[2]  J F Nichols,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field Validation , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[3]  H. Pollack,et al.  Epidemic increase in childhood overweight, 1986-1998. , 2001, JAMA.

[4]  D R Bassett,et al.  Comparison of MTI Accelerometer Cut-Points for Predicting Time Spent in Physical Activity , 2003, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  A. Bauman,et al.  Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[6]  J F Sallis,et al.  A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[7]  J. Billy,et al.  Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[8]  P S Freedson,et al.  Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity Using Motion Sensors and Heart Rate , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  L. Kann,et al.  Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Graham A Colditz,et al.  Youth recall and TriTrac accelerometer estimates of physical activity levels. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  A. Rosenbloom,et al.  Emerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes in youth. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[12]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  A. Bauman,et al.  The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  J. Witt,et al.  The stability of children's physical activity as measured by accelerometry and self-report. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  P. Freedson,et al.  Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  Laura Kann,et al.  Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. , 2002, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[19]  Marsha Dowda,et al.  CALIBRATION OF THE COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, INC. (CSA) ACCELEROMETER 256 , 1997 .

[20]  P. Freedson,et al.  Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.