Harmonization of accreditation to ISO15189

Abstract Over the years, ISO15189 has established itself as the international standard for quality management systems for all fields in laboratory medicine. As a result, also accreditation to this standard has increased in international adaptation. As a consequence, its impact grows as governments make the standard obligatory and/or national funding systems require ISO15189 accreditation for reimbursement. All these trends amplify each other. This overview aims to specify how ISO15189 has gained its current position as the harmonized quality standard that is not affected by borders between scientific (sub)fields nor between nations. From there, future challenges, opportunities and risks are addressed.

[1]  D. L. Williams,et al.  Clinical pathology accreditation: standards for the medical laboratory , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  Christoph Endrullat,et al.  Standardization and quality management in next-generation sequencing , 2016, Applied & translational genomics.

[3]  P. Davies.  NATA: 50 years experience with accreditation , 1996 .

[4]  M. Vaubourdolle,et al.  Accreditation process in European countries – an EFLM survey , 2016, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[5]  R. Jansen,et al.  Accreditation of medical laboratories in the European Union , 2007, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  W. Huisman.  European medical laboratory accreditation. Present situation and steps to harmonisation , 2012, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  Paulo Pereira,et al.  Part 2-ISO 15189 : 2012 “ Medical laboratories-Requirements for quality and competence ” , 2015 .

[9]  Marc H. M. Thelen.  Flexible scope for ISO15189 accreditation requires harmonization of scope specificity , 2017 .

[10]  M. Panteghini,et al.  Once upon a time: a tale of ISO 15189 accreditation , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  Chet Raymo,et al.  A pragmatic approach , 1977 .

[12]  D. Burnett.  ISO 15189:2003 – Quality management, evaluation and continual improvement , 2006, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[13]  M. Plebani,et al.  An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[14]  J. Queraltó,et al.  Usefulness of EC4 Essential Criteria for Quality Systems of Medical Laboratories as Guideline to the ISO 15189 and ISO 17025 Documents , 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[15]  M. Vaubourdolle,et al.  Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[16]  Cas Weykamp,et al.  Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  D. D. Hoolihan,et al.  Technical analysis of ISO/DIS 17025-general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories , 1999, 1999 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.99EX147).

[18]  M. Plebani,et al.  Verification of examination procedures in clinical laboratory for imprecision, trueness and diagnostic accuracy according to ISO 15189:2012: a pragmatic approach , 2017, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.