Parsing Complements: Comments on the Generality of the Principle of Minimal Attachment

Abstract Two experiments are described in this paper, which examine the processing of English sentences containing “complement” verbs, and which may be followed either by a nounphrase, as a direct object, or by a complement clause. It has been claimed by Frazier and Rayner (1982) that subjects are “garden-pathed” when reading reduced complements (lacking the overt complemetiser), and that this fact is strong evidence in support of the application of the principle of “Minimal Attachment” as a universal property of the human parser. Holmes, Kennedy, and Murray (1987) questioned this conclusion by providing evidence that full and reduced complements present equivalent problems, probably because of their greater structural complexity. Rayner and Frazier (1987) disputed this conclusion, ascribing it to an artefact resulting from the use of a self-paced reading task. The first experiment examines this controversy with a replication of the study by Holmes et al., measuring eye movements as the sentences are proc...

[1]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[2]  E. Wanner.  The ATN and the sausage machine: Which one is baloney? , 1980, Cognition.

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension , 1982 .

[5]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  19 – On Problems of Unconfounding Perceptual and Language Processes , 1983 .

[6]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions , 1984 .

[7]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity , 1985 .

[8]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Syntax, Preference, and Right Attachment , 1985, IJCAI.

[9]  H E Blanchard,et al.  CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF READING Technical Report No 285 A COMPARISON OF SOME PROCESSING TIME MEASURES BASED ON EYE ' MOVEMENTS , 2007 .

[10]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[11]  Donald Mitchell,et al.  Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. , 1987 .

[12]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parsing Temporarily Ambiguous Complements , 1987 .

[13]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Syntactic structure and the garden path , 1987 .

[14]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Spatial Coordinates and Reading: Comments on Monk (1985) , 1987 .

[15]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models , 1988 .

[17]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.