When Does Disengagement Correlate with Learning in Spoken Dialog Computer Tutoring?

We investigate whether an overall student disengagement label and six different labels of disengagement type are predictive of learning in a spoken dialog computer tutoring corpus. Our results show first that although students’ percentage of overall disengaged turns negatively correlates with the amount they learn, the individual types of disengagement correlate differently with learning: some negatively correlate with learning, while others don’t correlate with learning at all. Second, we show that these relationships change somewhat depending on student prerequisite knowledge level. Third, we show that using multiple disengagement types to predict learning improves predictive power. Overall, our results suggest that although adapting to disengagement should improve learning, maximizing learning requires different system interventions depending on disengagement type.

[1]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Tutoring Help Seeking: Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-cognitive Skills , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[2]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Repairing Disengagement With Non-Invasive Interventions , 2007, AIED.

[5]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Annotating Disengagement for Spoken Dialogue Computer Tutoring , 2011 .

[6]  Helen Pain,et al.  Informing the Detection of the Students' Motivational State: An Empirical Study , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Tools for Authoring a Dialogue Agent that Participates in Learning Studies , 2007, AIED.

[8]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Benefits and challenges of real-time uncertainty detection and adaptation in a spoken dialogue computer tutor , 2011, Speech Commun..

[9]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  What Are You Feeling? Investigating Student Affective States During Expert Human Tutoring Sessions , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement , 2005, AIED.

[11]  Manolis Mavrikis,et al.  Diagnosing and acting on student affect: the tutor’s perspective , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Prevention of Off-Task Gaming Behavior in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[13]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Effects of Dissuading Unnecessary Help Requests While Providing Proactive Help , 2005, AIED.