Internal Consistency of Event-Related Potentials Associated with Cognitive Control: N2/P3 and ERN/Pe

Recent studies in psychophysiology show an increased attention for examining the reliability of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), which are measures of cognitive control (e.g., Go/No-Go tasks). An important index of reliability is the internal consistency (e.g., Cronbach's alpha) of a measure. In this study, we examine the internal consistency of the N2 and P3 in a Go/No-Go task. Furthermore, we attempt to replicate the previously found internal consistency of the Error-Related Negativity (ERN) and Positive-Error (Pe) in an Eriksen Flanker task. Healthy participants performed a Go/No-Go task and an Eriksen Flanker task, whereby the amplitudes of the correct No-Go N2/P3, and error trials for ERN/Pe were the variables of interest. This study provides evidence that the N2 and P3 in a Go/No-Go task are internally consistent after 20 and 14 trials are included in the average, respectively. Moreover, the ERN and Pe become internally consistent after approximately 8 trials are included in the average. In addition guidelines and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  M. Coles,et al.  "Where did I go wrong?" A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  T. Treasure.  Where did I go wrong? , 1994, The Lancet.

[3]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  What We’ve Learned From Mistakes , 2012 .

[4]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  The stability of error-related brain activity with increasing trials. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Thérèse J. M. Overbeek,et al.  Dissociable Components of Error Processing on the Functional Significance of the Pe Vis-à-vis the Ern/ne Performance Monitoring Processes Reflected in the Ne and Pe Review of Studies That Report Both Ne and Pe: Associations and Dissociations Pharmacological Effects , 2022 .

[7]  D. Veltman,et al.  Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. , 2014, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[8]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Cook,et al.  Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Biological Psychology , 2022 .

[12]  M. Luijten,et al.  Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  M. Brier,et al.  How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: An Event Related Potentials study , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  S. Urbina,et al.  Psychological testing, 7th ed. , 1997 .

[15]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[16]  I. Franken,et al.  Influence of individual differences in craving and obsessive cocaine thoughts on attentional processes in cocaine abuse patients. , 2000, Addictive behaviors.

[17]  Ingmar H. A. Franken,et al.  Error-Related Brain Activity Predicts Cocaine Use After Treatment at 3-Month Follow-up , 2013, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  Charles H Hillman,et al.  On the number of trials necessary for stabilization of error-related brain activity across the life span. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  H. Möller,et al.  Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[23]  W. Gehring,et al.  Action-Monitoring Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2000, Psychological science.

[24]  A. Riesel,et al.  Reliability of the ERN across multiple tasks as a function of increasing errors. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[25]  Lianne M. Keemink,et al.  Error processing and response inhibition in excessive computer game players: an event‐related potential study , 2012, Addiction biology.

[26]  B. Christensen,et al.  Test–retest reliability and stability of N400 effects in a word-pair semantic priming paradigm , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  J. Cohen,et al.  On the number of trials needed for P300. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[30]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[31]  Greg H. Proudfit,et al.  Psychometric properties of the error-related negativity in children and adolescents. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[32]  M. Kraut,et al.  The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2–P3 response , 2009, Brain and Cognition.