“Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment

[1]  P. Schlenker.  Maximize Presupposition and Gricean reasoning , 2012 .

[2]  Nikkia DeLuz.  Border Wars , 2012 .

[3]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Matthew H Tong,et al.  SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics , 2009, Visual cognition.

[5]  Yi Ting Huang,et al.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Importance of Proving the Null , 2022 .

[7]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. , 2009 .

[8]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[9]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  V ects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition , 2006 .

[10]  David Swinney,et al.  Conceptual Combination During Sentence Comprehension , 2007, Psychological science.

[11]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  D. Sperber,et al.  The Why and How of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘Scalar Inferences’ , 2007 .

[13]  D. Fox.  Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures , 2007 .

[14]  Tony O’Hagan.  Bayes factors , 2006 .

[15]  Benjamin Russell,et al.  Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures , 2006, J. Semant..

[16]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion , 2006 .

[18]  John N. Williams,et al.  Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences , 2006, Cognition.

[19]  J. Snedeker,et al.  On-line Interpretation of Scalar Quantifiers: Insight into the Semantic-Pragmatics Interface , 2006 .

[20]  K. Turner,et al.  Where semantics meets pragmatics , 2006 .

[21]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[23]  Lewis Bott,et al.  Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences , 2004 .

[24]  A. Feeney,et al.  The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[25]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences , 2004 .

[26]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Structures and beyond , 2004 .

[28]  K.,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts , 2004 .

[29]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[30]  I. Noveck,et al.  Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study , 2003, Brain and Language.

[31]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[32]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  P. Ludlow.  Readings in the philosophy of language , 1999 .

[34]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[35]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Relevance theory : applications and implications , 1998 .

[36]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature , 1998 .

[37]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[38]  William A. Ladusaw.  Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong , 1994 .

[39]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[41]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  TOBI: a standard for labeling English prosody , 1992, ICSLP.

[42]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Semantik : ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung = Semantics : an international handbook of contemporary research , 1991 .

[43]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[44]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[45]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[46]  G. Murphy,et al.  Establishing and accessing referents in discourse , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Sirpa Mäki,et al.  The computer program , 1980 .

[48]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[49]  J. Sadock.  On Testing for Conversational Implicature , 1978 .

[50]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[51]  L. Rips.  Quantification and semantic memory , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[53]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[54]  I. Pollack,et al.  The Information of Elementary Multidimensional Auditory Displays , 1954 .

[55]  I. Pollack.  Assimilation of sequentially encoded information. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.