A comparison of bacterial populations in enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes using membrane filtration or gravity sedimentation for solids-liquid separation.

In an earlier phase of this study, we compared the performances of pilot scale treatment systems operated in either a conventional enhanced biological phosphorus removal (CEBPR) mode, or a membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal (MEBPR) mode. In the present investigation, we characterized the bacterial community populations in these processes during parallel operation with the same municipal wastewater feed. The objectives of the study were (1) to assess the similarity of the bacterial communities supported in the two systems over time, (2) to determine if distinct bacterial populations are associated with the MEBPR and CEBPR processes, and (3) to relate the dynamics of the community composition to changes in treatment process configuration and to treatment process performance. The characteristics of the bacterial populations were first investigated with ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, or RISA. To further understand the bacterial population dynamics, important RISA phylotypes were isolated and identified through 16S RNA gene sequencing. The parallel MEBPR and CEBPR systems developed bacterial communities that were distinct. The CEBPR community appeared to exhibit greater diversity, and this may have been the primary reason why the CEBPR treatment train demonstrated superior functional stability relative to the MEBPR counterpart. Moreover, the more diverse bacterial population apparent in the CEBPR system was observed to be more dynamic than that of the MEBPR process. Several RISA bands were found to be characteristic of either the membrane or conventional biological system. In particular, the MEBPR configuration appeared to be selective for the slow-growing organism Magnospira bakii and for the foam-associated Microthrix parvicella and Gordonia sp., while gravity separation led to the washout of M. parvicella. In both pilot trains, sequence analysis confirmed the presence of EBPR-related organisms such as Accumulibacter phosphatis. The survey of the CEBPR system also revealed many uncultured organisms that have not been well characterized. The study demonstrated that a simple replacement of a secondary clarifier with membrane solids-liquid separation is sufficient to shift the composition of an activated sludge microbial community significantly.

[1]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[2]  K. Straub,et al.  Screening for Genetic Diversity of Isolates of Anaerobic Fe(II)-oxidizing Bacteria Using DGGE and Wh , 1997 .

[3]  R. Amann,et al.  Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in an Aerated Lagoon Revealed by Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analyses and 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  A. Monti A comparative study of biological nutrient removal processes with gravity and membrane solids-liquid separation , 2006 .

[6]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC) , 2008 .

[7]  Karl Pearson,et al.  ON THE COEFFICIENT OF RACIAL LIKENESS , 1926 .

[8]  Daniel B. Oerther,et al.  Use of 16S rRNA Gene Terminal Restriction Fragment Analysis To Assess the Impact of Solids Retention Time on the Bacterial Diversity of Activated Sludge , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Killing two birds with one stone: simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from activated sludge biomass , 1999 .

[10]  P. Mielke,et al.  Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach , 2007 .

[11]  W. Mohn,et al.  Effects of Wildfire and Harvest Disturbances on Forest Soil Bacterial Communities , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  W. K. Oldham,et al.  Excess biological phosphorus removal in the activated sludge process using primary sludge fermentation , 1986 .

[13]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[14]  E. Hall,et al.  Use of a similarity index based on microbial fatty acid (MFA) analysis to monitor biological wastewater treatment systems , 2003, Environmental technology.

[15]  Andrew P. Martin Phylogenetic Approaches for Describing and Comparing the Diversity of Microbial Communities , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  H. Drexler,et al.  The Pearson product‐moment correlation coefficient is better suited for identification of DNA fingerprint profiles than band matching algorithms , 1993, Electrophoresis.

[17]  C. Grady,et al.  Microbial population dynamics in laboratory-scale activated sludge reactors. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  T. Melin,et al.  Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena. , 2008, Water research.

[19]  Damir Brdjanovic,et al.  TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON PHYSIOLOGY OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL , 1997 .

[20]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Functionally Relevant Microorganisms to Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance at Full‐Scale Wastewater Treatment Plants in the United States , 2008, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[21]  E. Hall,et al.  Comparative study of biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes with sedimentation and membrane‐based separation , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  E. Hall,et al.  Comparison of Nitrification Rates in Conventional and Membrane‐Assisted Biological Nutrient Removal Processes , 2008, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[24]  Natalia Ivanova,et al.  Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Min Yang,et al.  Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[26]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[27]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Kinetics of Phosphorus Release and Uptake in a Membrane-Assisted Biological Phosphorus Removal Process , 2007 .

[28]  R M Ben Aim,et al.  Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment and reuse: a success story. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogeny and in situ identification of a morphologically conspicuous bacterium, Candidatus Magnospira bakii, present at very low frequency in activated sludge. , 1999, Environmental microbiology.

[30]  H. Munro,et al.  Mammalian protein metabolism , 1964 .

[31]  M. Goodfellow,et al.  Dispelling the "Nocardia amarae" myth: a phylogenetic and phenotypic study of mycolic acid-containing actinomycetes isolated from activated sludge foam. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  A. K. Rowan,et al.  Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidising bacterial communities in wastewater treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[33]  Nazim Cicek,et al.  Characterization and Comparison of a Membrane Bioreactor and a Conventional Activated‐Sludge System in the Treatment of Wastewater Containing High‐Molecular‐Weight Compounds , 1999 .

[34]  M. Kraume,et al.  Microbiological aspects of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater. , 2002, Water research.

[35]  F. Fan,et al.  Interrelated effects of aeration and mixed liquor fractions on membrane fouling for submerged membrane bioreactor processes in wastewater treatment. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Analysis of bacterial community in membrane-separation bioreactors by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques , 2000 .

[37]  V. Stanisich,et al.  New approaches to typing and identification of bacteria using the 16S-23S rDNA spacer region. , 1996, Microbiology.

[38]  Ulrike Wachsmann,et al.  With contribution from , 2010 .

[39]  E. C. Pielou The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections , 1966 .