Eliciting and mapping tacit knowledge on teamwork success of Six Sigma teams

This study aims to elicit and map tacit knowledge on teamwork success as a lens to examine variations in team performance. A new approach based on narrative simulations and the traditional similarity ratings were adopted with Six Sigma teams in an international manufacturing company. Convergence in the knowledge maps among team members and that between teams and the management of the company have been examined. Both approaches revealed differences in high performance teams and average teams. The narrative simulations elicited richer knowledge, provided a second layer with contexts to a better understanding of team knowledge, and generated more actionable suggestions for team development. Misconceptions in some Six Sigma teams were also identified, which provide insights for team training and development. The study demonstrates the application of narratives and sensemaking theories to the elicitation of team knowledge in rich contexts and multiple layers.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  W. B. Lee,et al.  Knowledge elicitation in reliability management in the airline industry , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling: Concepts and Applications , 1989 .

[4]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Determining the essential characetristics of Six Sigma Black Belts , 2007 .

[5]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[6]  Mark J. Stein The critical period of disasters: Insights from sense-making and psychoanalytic theory , 2004 .

[7]  Do Hyoung Shin,et al.  Knowledge mapping model for construction project organizations , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[9]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[11]  Wing Bun Lee,et al.  A study of knowledge flow in Six Sigma teams in a Chinese manufacturing enterprise , 2010 .

[12]  Guendalina Capece,et al.  Measuring knowledge creation in virtual teams through the social network analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge: A Window to the Cognitive Underpinnings of Team Performance , 2003 .

[14]  Tracy X. P. Zou,et al.  Development of a research tool for the elicitation of consumer response , 2007 .

[15]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[17]  Cynthia J. Bean,et al.  Leader framing and follower sensemaking , 2006 .

[18]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Pathfinder associative networks: studies in knowledge organization , 1990 .

[19]  Eleftheria Vasileiadou,et al.  Research teams as complex systems: implications for knowledge management , 2012 .

[20]  David Snowden From atomism to networks in social systems , 2005 .

[21]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Determining the essential characteristics of Six Sigma Black Belts Results from a pilot study in UKmanufacturing companies , 2007 .

[22]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Cross-Functional Teams: A Coopetitive Model , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[23]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[24]  N.A.D. Connell,et al.  Narrative approaches to the transfer of organisational knowledge , 2004 .

[25]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[26]  Tatiana Gavrilova,et al.  Knowledge Elicitation Techniques in a Knowledge Management Context , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  K. Klein,et al.  Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy , 2006 .

[28]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[29]  Mohamed Gamal Aboelmaged,et al.  Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research , 2010 .

[30]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[31]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  From group-based work to organisational learning: the role of communication forms and knowledge sharing , 2011 .

[32]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Making sense of sensemaking narratives , 2008 .

[33]  Roy Williams,et al.  Narratives of knowledge and intelligence ... beyond the tacit and explicit , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Shams‐ur Rahman,et al.  CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF SIX-SIGMA IMPLEMENTATION: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS BASED STUDY , 2006 .

[35]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[36]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisations , 2002 .

[37]  B. Rosendaal,et al.  Sharing knowledge, being different and working as a team , 2009 .

[38]  P. Lievre,et al.  Towards a codification of practical knowledge , 2008 .

[39]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Mental Models of Groups as Social Systems , 1995 .

[40]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  An Overview of Six Sigma , 2008 .

[41]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[42]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[43]  David M. Boje,et al.  STORIES OF THE STORYTELLING ORGANIZATION: A POSTMODERN ANALYSIS OF DISNEY AS "TAMARA-LAND" , 1995 .

[44]  John P. Rice,et al.  Concept maps: a technique for assessing knowledge manager learning needs , 2009 .

[45]  Shuqin Cai,et al.  The Role of Relational Characteristics in Information Seeking for Opportunity Recognition , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.