Hobby Ranching and Chile's Land‐reform Legacy*

ABSTRACT. Twentieth‐century land reform in Chile reflects familiar themes. The state subdivided large land monopolies, ostensibly for social justice reasons: to provide opportunities for campesinos to earn a living from agriculture. In southern Chile's Tierra del Fuego a combination of social justice, nationalism, and geopolitical concerns stimulated land reform between 1924 and 1978. The effort succeeded in creating a new material landscape oriented around smaller ranches but failed to meet its socioeconomic goals. In a scenario that resonates with reforms elsewhere in Latin America, an elitist cultural landscape dominated by large‐holding corporations was replaced with another elitist landscape, though in a different form. Politically well‐connected and essentially absentee landholders acquired subdivided land and began to practice “hobby ranching.” The history of land reform in Tierra del Fuego demonstrates how new socioeconomic conditions created over the course of many decades have left their imprint on land use and the biophysical landscape. It also contributes to larger regional debates about the role of land degradation in stocking‐rate decline.

[1]  A. Fraser,et al.  Land Reform in the Era of Neoliberalism: Case Studies From the Global South , 2008 .

[2]  N. Argent,et al.  The Amenity Complex: Towards a Framework for Analysing and Predicting the Emergence of a Multifunctional Countryside in Australia , 2007 .

[3]  R. Loeffler,et al.  Amenity Migration in the U.S. Sierra Nevada* , 2007 .

[4]  C. Stokes,et al.  Fragmentation of Australian rangelands: processes, benefits and risks of changing patterns of land use , 2006 .

[5]  J. Holmes,et al.  Impulses towards a Multifunctional Transition in Rural Australia: Gaps in the Research Agenda. , 2006 .

[6]  J. Paruelo,et al.  Demography, population dynamics and sustainability of the Patagonian sheep flocks , 2006 .

[7]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[8]  William J. McConnell,et al.  Global Land Project: Science Plan and ImplementationStrategy , 2005 .

[9]  P. Thornton,et al.  Quantifying Declines in Livestock Due to Land Subdivision , 2005 .

[10]  Guðrún Gísladóttir,et al.  Land degradation control and its global environmental benefits , 2005 .

[11]  N. Sayre.  Viewpoint: The Need for Qualitative Research to Understand Ranch Management , 2004 .

[12]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  GRAZING SYSTEMS, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES, AND GLOBAL CHANGE , 2004 .

[13]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamic Causal Patterns of Desertification , 2004 .

[14]  P. Robbins.  Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction , 2004 .

[15]  N. M. Kelly,et al.  Ranchers Vs. Ranchettes in California's Oak Rangelands , 2004 .

[16]  Peter Klepeis,et al.  Development policies and tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsula: centralized and decentralized approaches , 2003 .

[17]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Contribution of the Patagonia Icefields of South America to Sea Level Rise , 2003, Science.

[18]  L. Fortmann,et al.  Landscape changes in Nevada County reflect social and ecological transitions , 2003 .

[19]  R. Villalba,et al.  Large-Scale Temperature Changes across the Southern Andes: 20th-Century Variations in the Context of the Past 400 Years , 2003 .

[20]  C. Kay.  Chile’s Neoliberal Agrarian Transformation and the Peasantry , 2002 .

[21]  Carol Morris,et al.  Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy , 2002 .

[22]  Jeremy D. Maestas,et al.  Biodiversity and Land‐Use Change in the American Mountain West , 2001 .

[23]  D. Aagesen,et al.  Crisis and conservation at the end of the world: sheep ranching in Argentine Patagonia , 2000, Environmental Conservation.

[24]  Simon Batterbury,et al.  Environmental histories, access to resources and landscape change: an introduction , 1999 .

[25]  B. M. Martinic.  6. The Meeting of Two Cultures Indians and Colonists in the Magellan Region , 1998 .

[26]  A. Cibils,et al.  Stable states in relation to grazing in Patagonia: a 10-year experimental trial , 1998 .

[27]  J. Puigdefabregas.  Ecological impacts of global change on drylands and their implications for desertification , 1998 .

[28]  D. A. Gagliardini,et al.  Status of desertification in the Patagonian region: Assessment and mapping from satellite imagery , 1998 .

[29]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Range assessment using remote sensing in Northwest Patagonia (Argentina). , 1994 .

[30]  A. Janvry.  Latin American land reforms in theory and practice: A retrospective analysis: Peter Dorner, (The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI, 1992), pp. ix + 108 , 1994 .

[31]  Nancy Plankey Videla,et al.  The Military Regime and Restructuring of Land Tenure , 1991 .

[32]  S. Hecht.  Environment, Development and Politics: Capital Accumulation and the Livestock Sector in Eastern Amazonia , 1985 .

[33]  E. M. Campbell,et al.  The human geography of Southern Chile , 1958 .

[34]  L. Moss.  The amenity migrants: ecological challenge to contemporary Shangri-La. , 2006 .

[35]  S. Bekessy,et al.  Change and continuity in peri-urban Australia, state of the peri-urban regions: a review of the literature , 2006 .

[36]  L. Moss.  The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. , 2006 .

[37]  C. Rostagno,et al.  Soil erosion as affected by shrub encroachment in northeastern Patagonia. , 2002 .

[38]  A. Zoomers,et al.  Conflict over natural resources and conservation in the indigenous community of Cuzalapa, Western Mexico. , 2001 .

[39]  Peter Klepeis,et al.  Integrated land history and global change science: The example of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region project , 2001 .

[40]  D. Coppock,et al.  Use of Livestock and Range Management Practices in Utah , 1999 .

[41]  W. C. Thiesenhusen.  Broken Promises: Agrarian Reform And The Latin American Campesino , 1995 .

[42]  W. C. Thiesenhusen,et al.  Searching for agrarian reform in Latin America , 1989 .