Cost feasibility analysis of translucent optical networks with shared wavelength converters

Translucent optical networks have emerged as potential yet feasible candidates to bridge the gap between the opaque and transparent network architectures. By allowing electrical 3R signal regeneration only at selected points in the network, translucent architectures represent a cost-effective, power-efficient solution. Concurrently, forecasts predicting highly dynamic traffic patterns make it crucial for next-generation transport networks to engage highly agile technologies that include sub-wavelength switching (SWS). In translucent SWS networks, contention resolution is achieved through the still technologically immature all-optical wavelength converters (WCs). Since WCs are expected to be expensive, power-consuming devices, there has been significant research effort on devising WC-sharing architectures, which aim at minimizing the number of these devices in the network. WC sharing, however, requires complex switching fabrics that involve a much higher number of optical gates and stronger degradation due to physical layer impairments (more electrical 3R regenerators). It is clear, then, that the technological interest in WC-sharing architectures mainly depends on the cost trade-offs existing between these three components. For this reason, in this work, we carry out a comprehensive cost feasibility analysis of translucent networks based on asynchronous WC-sharing packet switches. After modeling a set of translucent WC-sharing switching fabrics, we assess their performance in an isolated node scenario in terms of the number of WCs and optical gates required. Given the results obtained, we select the shared-per-node (SPN) architecture to compare its hardware requirements with those of a network based on dedicated WC nodes (i.e., one WC per wavelength and input port). To this end, an iterative simulation algorithm is used to dimension translucent SWS networks considering a broad range of continental-scale topologies. The results are first analyzed using relative cost values, and finally the viability/feasibility of WC-sharing schemes is discussed considering state-of-the-art technology. Our main conclusion is that, for SPN-based architectures to become cost effective, the cost of WCs has to be at least two orders of magnitude higher than that of the optical gate and similar to or lower than that of the electrical 3R regenerator.

[1]  Nail Akar,et al.  Shared-per-wavelength asynchronous optical packet switching: A comparative analysis , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[2]  N. Pleros,et al.  40 Gb/s NRZ Wavelength Conversion Using a Differentially-Biased SOA-MZI: Theory and Experiment , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Chava Vijaya Saradhi,et al.  Physical layer impairment aware routing (PLIAR) in WDM optical networks: issues and challenges , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  J. M. Simmons Analysis of wavelength conversion in all-optical express backbone networks , 2002, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit.

[5]  Method for the Determination of a Quality-of-Transmission Estimator along the Lightpaths of Partially Transparent Networks , 2007 .

[6]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Sparse Regeneration in Translucent Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks: Architecture, Network Design and Wavelength Routing , 2005, Photonic Network Communications.

[7]  Chonggang Wang,et al.  REPARE: Regenerator Placement and Routing Establishment in Translucent Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[8]  C. Raffaelli,et al.  Multistage Shared-Per-Wavelength Optical Packet Switch: Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm and Performance , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  M. Listanti,et al.  Resources sharing in optical packet switches with limited-range wavelength converters , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  Masayuki Murata,et al.  Design of wavelength-convertible edge nodes in wavelength-routed networks , 2006 .

[11]  S. J. Ben Yoo All-optical regeneration for ultra-long fiber links and its prospects for future applications with new modulation formats , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[12]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Translucent optical networks: the way forward [Topics in Optical Communications] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  J. Sole-Pareta,et al.  Regenerator Placement Strategies for Translucent OBS Networks , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  P. Zakynthinos,et al.  Cascadability Performance Evaluation of a New NRZ SOA-MZI Wavelength Converter , 2009, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[15]  Vincent W. S. Chan Optical flow switching , 2006, 2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems.

[16]  P. Green CommuniCrostic puzzle - puzzle no. 258 , 2004 .

[17]  Jaafar M. H. Elmirghani,et al.  All-optical wavelength conversion: technologies and applications in DWDM networks , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[18]  S.J.B. Yoo,et al.  Optical Packet and Burst Switching Technologies for the Future Photonic Internet , 2006, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[19]  Ramon Casellas,et al.  Challenges for GMPLS lightpath provisioning in transparent optical networks: Wavelength constraints in routing and signaling , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  M. Listanti,et al.  Power Consumption in Bufferless Optical Packet Switches in SOA Technology , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[21]  Davide Careglio,et al.  Translucent OBS network architectures with dedicated and shared wavelength converters , 2011, 2011 16th European Conference on Networks and Optical Communications.

[22]  Nail Akar,et al.  Wavelength converter sharing in asynchronous optical packet/burst switching: An exact blocking analysis for markovian arrivals , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[23]  R. Martínez,et al.  Experimental Translucent-Oriented Routing for Dynamic Lightpath Provisioning in GMPLS-Enabled Wavelength Switched Optical Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  Cross-Layer Approaches for Planning and Operating Impairment-Aware Optical Networks , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  J. A. Walker,et al.  Network control and management challenges in opaque networks utilizing transparent optical switches , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  E. Patzak,et al.  Analysis of the Physical Impairments on Maximum Size and Throughput of SOA-Based Optical Burst Switching Nodes , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[27]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  Performance analyses of optical burst-switching networks , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[28]  Michal Pióro,et al.  SNDlib 1.0—Survivable Network Design Library , 2010, Networks.

[29]  Carla Raffaelli,et al.  Packet loss analysis of shared-per-wavelength multi-fiber all-optical switch with parallel scheduling , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[30]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Technological challenges on the road toward transparent networking , 2008 .

[31]  S. L. Danielsen,et al.  Wavelength conversion in optical packet switching , 1998 .

[32]  Young Lee,et al.  A Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with Impairments , 2012, RFC.

[33]  Carla Raffaelli,et al.  Physical path analysis in photonic switches with shared wavelength converters , 2010, 2010 12th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.

[34]  Bin Li,et al.  Simultaneous all-optical 3R regeneration of multiple WDM channels , 2005, 2005 IEEE LEOS Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings.

[35]  Tomofumi Kise,et al.  Cascadability properties of MZI-SOA-based all-optical 3R regenerators for RZ-DPSK signals. , 2011, Optics express.

[36]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Translucent Optical Networks: The Way Forward , 2007 .

[37]  S. Foster,et al.  Merits of hybrid optical networking , 2002, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit.

[38]  J. Junio,et al.  Channel power excursions from single-step channel provisioning , 2012, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[39]  Miroslaw Klinkowski,et al.  JAVOBS: A Flexible Simulator for OBS Network Architectures , 2010, J. Networks.

[40]  M Listanti,et al.  Evaluation of Power Consumption in Low Spatial Complexity Optical Switching Fabrics , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[41]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  A survey on physical layer impairments aware routing and wavelength assignment algorithms in optical networks , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[42]  D. Careglio,et al.  Offline Routing and Regenerator Placement and Dimensioning for Translucent OBS Networks , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[43]  Benjamin J Eggleton,et al.  3R optical regeneration: an all-optical solution with BER improvement. , 2006, Optics express.

[44]  Zhong Pan,et al.  First Field Demonstrations of 1000-Hop Cascaded All-Optical 3R Regeneration in 10 Gb/s NRZ Transmission , 2006 .

[45]  Keren Bergman,et al.  Demonstration of Asynchronous Operation of a Multiwavelength Optical Packet-Switched Fabric , 2010, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[46]  P. Zakynthinos,et al.  An SOA-MZI NRZ Wavelength Conversion Scheme With Enhanced 2R Regeneration Characteristics , 2009, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[47]  Marco Listanti,et al.  A comparison study on the number of wavelength converters needed in synchronous and asynchronous all-optical switching architectures , 2003 .

[48]  P. Kokkinos,et al.  Joint Online Routing, Wavelength Assignment and Regenerator Allocation in Translucent Optical Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[49]  J.P. Heritage,et al.  Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks , 1999, OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication.

[50]  Didier Colle,et al.  Pan-European Optical Transport Networks: An Availability-based Comparison , 2004, Photonic Network Communications.