Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.

PURPOSE Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive stimulation technique for shaping neuroplastic processes and possibly entraining ongoing neural oscillations in humans. Despite the growing number of studies using tACS, we know little about the procedural sensations caused by stimulation. In order to fill this gap, we explored the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception during tACS. METHODS Twenty healthy participants took part in a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled study, where volunteers received short duration stimulation at 1.0 mA intensity between 2 to 250 Hz using the standard left motor cortex-contralateral supraorbital montage. We recorded the perception onset latency and the strength of the sensations assessed by visual rating scale as dependent variables. RESULTS We found that tACS evoked both cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception in a frequency-dependent manner. Our results show that the most perceptible procedural sensations were induced in the beta and gamma frequency range, especially at 20 Hz, whereas minimal procedural sensations were indicated in the ripple range (140 and 250 Hz). CONCLUSIONS We believe that our results provide a relevant insight into the procedural sensations caused by oscillatory currents, and will offer a basis for developing more sophisticated stimulation protocols and study designs for future investigations.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  B. Krekelberg,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation over visual cortex evokes phosphenes with a retinal origin. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Engel,et al.  Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Frequency Specific Modulation of Human Somatosensory Cortex , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[9]  Fabrizio Benedetti,et al.  New Insights into the Placebo and Nocebo Responses , 2008, Neuron.

[10]  Peter Brown,et al.  Boosting Cortical Activity at Beta-Band Frequencies Slows Movement in Humans , 2009, Current Biology.

[11]  H. Jelinek,et al.  Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. , 2010, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[15]  B. Hoggart,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[16]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[19]  M. Siegel,et al.  A framework for local cortical oscillation patterns , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  S. Rossi,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Tuning of the Human Motor System Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  F. Fregni,et al.  A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[22]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  M. Lavidor,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Increases Risk-Taking Behavior in the Balloon Analog Risk Task , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[24]  W. Paulus,et al.  Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  M Schulzer,et al.  Expectation and Dopamine Release: Mechanism of the Placebo Effect in Parkinson's Disease , 2001, Science.

[26]  Géza Gergely Ambrus,et al.  Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Walter Paulus,et al.  On the difficulties of separating retinal from cortical origins of phosphenes when using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  Lena Sarp,et al.  The fade-in – Short stimulation – Fade out approach to sham tDCS – Reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators , 2012, Brain Stimulation.