Performance of chemical shift-based water-fat separation with self-calibrated fat spectrum is sensitive to echo times

Chemical shift-based water-fat separation method utilises water-fat resonance frequency difference to decompose signals into water and fat partitions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a pixel-wise basis. It provides an effective way to measure fat fraction, or to suppress fat signal which might obscure underlying pathology. IDEAL (Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation) algorithm with multi-peak fat spectral modelling has been developed. Recent studies have discussed the performance of this algorithm assuming that the frequencies and relative amplitudes of fat peaks are constant among all subjects. However, the fat spectra vary in different tissues, thus a self-calibration method which estimates the fat spectrum directly from the data provides more accurate results. In this work, we analyse the performance of multi-peak IDEAL algorithm with self-calibrated fat spectrum by theoretical calculation, simulation, and experiments, and find optimal echo time increments which provide reliable water-fat separation.

[1]  G. Glover Multipoint dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Scott B Reeder,et al.  Water–fat separation with IDEAL gradient‐echo imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  G. Gold,et al.  Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL): Application with fast spin‐echo imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  S. Reeder,et al.  Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water‐fat decomposition and T2* estimation , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  S. Reeder,et al.  Multiecho water‐fat separation and simultaneous R  2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  C. Sirlin,et al.  In vivo characterization of the liver fat 1H MR spectrum , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Paul C. Lauterbur,et al.  Principles of magnetic resonance imaging : a signal processing perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Norbert J Pelc,et al.  Cramér–Rao bounds for three‐point decomposition of water and fat , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  S. Reeder,et al.  Noise analysis for 3‐point chemical shift‐based water‐fat separation with spectral modeling of fat , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Michael Markl,et al.  Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least‐squares estimation method , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  G H Glover,et al.  Lung parenchyma: magnetic susceptibility in MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  W. T. Dixon Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[13]  Alexey Samsonov,et al.  Independent estimation of T*2 for water and fat for improved accuracy of fat quantification , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  S. Reeder,et al.  T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: Validation in a fat‐water‐SPIO phantom , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.