On weighted parametric tests

We describe a general framework for weighted parametric multiple test procedures based on the closure principle. We utilize general weighting strategies that can reflect complex study objectives and include many procedures in the literature as special cases. The proposed weighted parametric tests bridge the gap between rejection rules using either adjusted significance levels or adjusted p-values. This connection is possible by allowing intersection hypotheses to be tested at level smaller than α, which may be needed for certain study considerations. For such cases we introduce a subclass of exact α-level parametric tests which satisfy the consonance property. When only subsets of test statistics are correlated, a new procedure is proposed to fully utilize the parametric assumptions within each subset. We illustrate the proposed weighted parametric tests using a clinical trial example.

[1]  C. Dunnett A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[2]  M. Huque,et al.  A flexible fixed-sequence testing method for hierarchically ordered correlated multiple endpoints in clinical trials , 2008 .

[3]  Yogendra P. Chaubey Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment , 1993 .

[4]  K. Gabriel,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDURES-SOME THEORY OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS' , 1969 .

[5]  Martin Posch,et al.  Multiple Testing for Identifying Effective and Safe Treatments , 2001 .

[6]  G. Hommel,et al.  Powerful short‐cuts for multiple testing procedures with special reference to gatekeeping strategies , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  W. Brannath,et al.  A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[9]  Dong Xi,et al.  A general multistage procedure for k‐out‐of‐n gatekeeping , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests , 2011, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[11]  O. Guilbaud,et al.  A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni‐based multiple tests , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  C. Xie Weighted multiple testing correction for correlated tests , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[14]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Some practical considerations for phase III studies with biomarker evaluations. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  P H Westfall,et al.  Using prior information to allocate significance levels for multiple endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Multivariate Normal and t Distributions , 2016 .

[17]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Memory and other properties of multiple test procedures generated by entangled graphs , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Yosef Hochberg,et al.  Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut , 1999 .

[19]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  General Multistage Gatekeeping Procedures , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[20]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Step-down multiple tests for comparing treatments with a control in unbalanced one-way layouts. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.