Effect of fingerspelling task on temporal characteristics and perceived naturalness of speech in simultaneous communication.

This study investigated the effect of fingerspelling task length on temporal characteristics and perceived naturalness of speech produced during simultaneous communication. Stimulus words at four levels of fingerspelling task length were embedded in a sentence that was spoken and produced with simultaneous communication. Five temporal measures were calculated from acoustic recordings, and perceived speech naturalness was rated by a panel of listeners using a 9-point scale. Results indicated significant differences in temporal measures and naturalness ratings between the speech and simultaneous communication conditions and among levels of fingerspelling task length. Speech produced during simultaneous communication was rated as less natural and demonstrated increased interword interval, diphthong, word, and sentence durations. Regression analysis indicated significant correlations between temporal measures and perceived speech naturalness, and analysis of variance showed significant increases in segmental and interword interval durations and perceived speech unnaturalness as fingerspelling task length increased. These results are discussed in relation to previous findings regarding production and perception characteristics of speech that is altered in temporal parameters by a variety of conditions.

[1]  L. Boves,et al.  Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  I. Lehiste The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .

[3]  U. Bellugi,et al.  A comparison of sign language and spoken language , 1972 .

[4]  J. Windsor,et al.  Key word signing: perceived and acoustic differences between signed and spoken narratives. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  D R Beukelman,et al.  The effect of rate control on the intelligibility and naturalness of dysarthric speech. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[6]  W. Stokoe,et al.  Simultaneous Communication in the Classroom: How Well is English Grammar Represented? , 2013 .

[7]  N. Schiavetti,et al.  Temporal characteristics of speech in simultaneous communication. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Estimation of the reliability of ratings , 1951 .

[9]  Sherman Wilcox,et al.  The phonetics of fingerspelling , 1992 .

[10]  R. Ingham,et al.  Speech quality measurement and the management of stuttering. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  R. A. Prosek,et al.  Speech naturalness ratings of treated stutterers. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  M. Maxwell,et al.  The synergy of sign and speech in simultaneous communication , 1985, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  N. Schiavetti,et al.  Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[15]  The Role of Fingerspelling in Simultaneous Communication , 2013 .

[16]  Psychophysical analysis of audiovisual judgments of speech naturalness of nonstutterers and stutterers. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  R. Martin,et al.  Stuttering and speech naturalness. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[18]  Michael Strong,et al.  Simultaneous Communication: Are Teachers Attempting An Impossible Task? , 1987, American annals of the deaf.

[19]  P. Worchel,et al.  The Psychology of Deafness , 1961 .