Comparison of propagation-based phase-contrast CT and absorption-based CT for breast imaging using synchrotron radiation

Propagation-based phase-contrast CT (PB-CT) is a novel imaging technique that visualises variations in both X-ray attenuation and refraction. This study aimed to compare the clinical image quality of breast PB-CT using synchrotron radiation with conventional absorption-based CT (AB-CT), at the same radiation dose. Seven breast mastectomy specimens were scanned and evaluated by a group of 14 radiologists and medical imaging experts who assessed the images based on seven radiological image quality criteria. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) were used to analyse the results and the area under the VGC curve was obtained to measure the differences between the two techniques. For six image quality criteria (overall quality, perceptible contrast, lesion sharpness, normal tissue interfaces, calcification visibility and image noise), PB-CT images were superior to AB-CT images of the same dose (AUCVGC: 0.704 to 0.914, P≤.05). For the seventh criteria (artefacts), PB-CT images were also rated better than AB-CT images (AUCVGC: 0.647) but the difference was not significant. The results of this study provide a solid basis for future experimental and clinical protocols of breast PB-CT.

[1]  Marcus J Kitchen,et al.  A feasibility study of X-ray phase-contrast mammographic tomography at the Imaging and Medical beamline of the Australian Synchrotron. , 2015, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[2]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[3]  M McCormack,et al.  Optimization of propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography for breast cancer imaging , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Emilio Quaia,et al.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  S Pacilè,et al.  Clinical application of low-dose phase contrast breast CT: methods for the optimization of the reconstruction workflow. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[6]  J. Trogdon,et al.  Cost of Breast Cancer Treatment in Medicaid: Implications for State Programs Providing Coverage for Low-Income Women , 2011, Medical care.

[7]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Advancements towards the implementation of clinical phase-contrast breast computed tomography at Elettra. , 2019, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[8]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Phase-contrast breast CT: the effect of propagation distance , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. , 2015, JAMA.

[10]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  P. Brennan,et al.  Dynamics of breast imaging research: A global scoping review and Sino-Australian comparison case study , 2019, PloS one.

[12]  John M. Boone,et al.  Computed Tomography for Imaging the Breast , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[13]  K. Straif,et al.  Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Wilkins,et al.  Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  J. Mayer,et al.  Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography , 2014 .

[18]  Patrick C. Brennan,et al.  Towards clinic-friendly solutions for patient trials in breast cancer phase contrast imaging , 2018, Other Conferences.

[19]  F Arfelli,et al.  Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba,et al.  X-Ray Phase-Contrast Technology in Breast Imaging: Principles, Options, and Clinical Application. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  D Lockie,et al.  Propagation-based X-ray phase-contrast tomography of mastectomy samples using synchrotron radiation. , 2019, Medical physics.

[22]  S. Zackrisson,et al.  Breast cancer imaging - A rapidly evolving discipline. , 2019, Breast.

[23]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Monochromatic breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: phase-contrast and phase-retrieved image comparison and full-volume reconstruction. , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[24]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[25]  Emmanuel Brun,et al.  High-resolution, low-dose phase contrast X-ray tomography for 3D diagnosis of human breast cancers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Luigi Rigon,et al.  Clinical study in phase- contrast mammography: image-quality analysis , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Carolyn Nickson,et al.  Toward Improving Breast Cancer Imaging: Radiological Assessment of Propagation-Based Phase-Contrast CT Technology. , 2019, Academic radiology.

[28]  A. Peele,et al.  Propagation-Based Phase-Contrast CT of the Breast Demonstrates Higher Quality Than Conventional Absorption-Based CT Even at Lower Radiation Dose. , 2020, Academic radiology.