From Blaming the Middle to Harnessing its Potential: Creating Change Intermediaries

Middle managers have been under attack as organizational downsizing and reengineering have reduced their number. They are also frequently portrayed as obstructive and resistant to change. However, recent research suggests that managers at middle levels in organizations may be able to make a strategic contribution. Data from research on how managers in an organization undergoing transformation experience change are used to build on this existing research to demonstrate that middle managers fulfil a complex 'change intermediary' position during implementation. The findings reveal that a key aspect of this position is the need for middle managers to engage in a range of activities to aid their interpretation of the change intent. This interpretation activity then informs the personal changes they attempt to undertake, how they help others through change, how they keep the business going during the transition and what changes they implement in their departments. The interpretation aspect of their role is often overlooked, leading to workload issues and role conflict. These findings offer an alternative perspective on perceived middle manager resistance and lead into suggestions for future research and organizational implications.

[1]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  The Challenge of Organizational Change , 1992 .

[2]  Katherine A. Lawrence,et al.  Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. , 2001 .

[3]  The Middle Management Challenge: Moving from Crisis to Empowerment , 1992 .

[4]  Mark Fenton‐O'Creevy Employee involvement and the middle manager: saboteur or scapegoat? , 2001 .

[5]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[6]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Identifying and appraising how managers install strategy , 1987 .

[7]  Stephen Procter,et al.  The empowerment of middle managers in a community health trust: structure, responsibility and culture , 1999 .

[8]  R. Goffee,et al.  Reluctant Managers: Their Work and Lifestyles , 1989 .

[9]  W. K. Schilit AN EXAMINATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF MIDDLE-LEVEL MANAGERS IN FORMULATING AND IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIC DECISIONS , 1987 .

[10]  Rosemary Stewart,et al.  Information technology, organizational restructuring and the future of middle management , 1993 .

[11]  David R. Brodwin,et al.  Strategic implementation: Five approaches to an elusive phenomenon , 1984 .

[12]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  Robert A. Burgelman A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[14]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Stuck in the Middle? Managers in Building Societies , 1997 .

[15]  Mark Fenton-O'Creevy,et al.  Employee involvement and the middle manager: evidence from a survey of organizations , 1998 .

[16]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[17]  S. Dopson,et al.  What is Happening to Middle Management , 1990 .

[18]  S. Floyd,et al.  Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note , 1992 .

[19]  M. Goold Research notes and communications design, learning and planning: A further observation on the design school debate , 1992 .

[20]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest , 1986 .

[21]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  Middle Management’s Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[22]  Graeme Currie,et al.  The Influence of Middle Managers in the Business Planning Process: A Case Study in the UK NHS , 1999 .

[23]  G. Spreitzer,et al.  Empowering Middle Managers to be Transformational Leaders , 1996 .

[24]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence , 1994 .

[25]  Jean E. Neumann,et al.  Uncertainty, Contrariness and the Double-Bind: Middle Managers' Reactions to their Changing Contracts , 1998 .

[26]  C. Grey ‘We Are All Managers Now’; ‘We Always Were’: On the Development and Demise of Management , 1999 .

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  David Boddy,et al.  The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity , 1992 .

[29]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[30]  Stephen Procter,et al.  Exploring the relationship between HR and middle managers , 2001 .

[31]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[32]  Y. Doz,et al.  Strategy process research: Focusing on corporate self‐renewal , 1992 .

[33]  Lynn A. Isabella Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events , 1990 .

[34]  R. Likert,et al.  New Patterns of Management. , 1963 .

[35]  F. Westley Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion , 1990 .

[36]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[37]  Helen Newell,et al.  Muddle in the middle: organizational restructuring and middle management careers , 1996 .

[38]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Careering Downwards? Middle Managers' Experiences in the Downsized Organization , 1999 .

[39]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[40]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .