Response of maize varieties under variable planting geometry in Kandahar semi-arid situation

A field experiment was conducted during spring season, 2015 at Tarnak Research Farm of Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University (ANASTU), Kandahar, Afghanistan with semi-arid climate to found out the response of yield, economics and energy relation of maize varieties under varying planting geometry. The experiment was conducted in FRBD and replicated thrice. The treatment details include: two maize hybrids CS-200 and AB-01 and four planting geometry [P1 (75 × 33.3cm) with plant population of 40,000 plantsha, P2 (75 × 22.2cm) with plant population of 60,000 plantsha, P3 (75 × 16.7cm) with plant population of 80,000 plantsha and P4 (75 × 13.3cm) with plant population of 100,000 plantsha]. Results showed that maize hybrid CS-200 performed significantly superior in terms of grain yield (6.41 t ha-) and harvest index (37.6%) compared to AB01 (5.81 tha and 33.4%, respectively). Both of maize hybrids (CS-200 and AB-01) did not differ significantly with respect to gross return, net return. B: C ratio, energy output and energy use efficiency due to their significant variation in producing grain and stover yields. Among the varying planting geometry, the wider planting geometry recorded significantly better performance for all yields attributes. Planting geometry P2 recorded significantly greater performance in terms of yields attributes. Therefore, hybrid CS-200 and planting geometry P2 is recommended for obtaining higher yield of maize, which can assure a net income of 221,371Afnha to the farmers of Kandahar semi-arid situation.

[1]  J. Shrestha,et al.  Tillage and planting density affect the performance of maize hybrids in Chitwan, Nepal , 2015 .

[2]  Farid Sarjamei,et al.  Effect of planting methods and plant density , on morphological , phenological , yield and yield component of baby corn , 2015 .

[3]  H. Kaechele,et al.  Energy self-sufficient sustainable integrated farming systems for livelihood security under a changing climate scenario in an Indian context: a case-study approach. , 2015 .

[4]  H. Mobasser,et al.  Influence of Water Stress and Plant Density on some Characteristics in corn , 2015 .

[5]  V. Ion,et al.  Maize plant biomass at different hybrids, plant populations, row spacing and soil conditions , 2014 .

[6]  P. Sp,et al.  RESPONSE OF SWEET CORN HYBRID TO VARYING PLANT DENSITIES AND NITROGEN LEVELS , 2012 .

[7]  A. Tanveer,et al.  Agro-Economic Evaluation of Various Maize Hybrids Under Different Planting Patterns , 2012 .

[8]  M. Abuzar,et al.  Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize. , 2011 .

[9]  A. Khan,et al.  Impact of plant populations and nitrogen levels on maize. , 2010 .

[10]  Shahin Rafiee,et al.  ENERGY USE AND ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF POTATO PRODUCTION IN IRAN A CASE STUDY: ARDABIL PROVINCE , 2008 .

[11]  A. Ghafoor,et al.  Production potential of three maize hybrids as influenced by varying plant density , 2008 .

[12]  M. Arif,et al.  EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION ON MAIZE HYBRIDS , 2007 .

[13]  V. Sadras,et al.  Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize , 2001 .

[14]  K. A. Gomez,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[15]  R. Singh,et al.  Effect of nitrogen, moisture regime and plant density on grain yield and quality of hybrid maize [India]. , 1976 .