Positive Feedback in Hierarchical Connectionist Models: Applications to Language Production

Recent connectionist models of the perception and production of words make use of positive feedback from later to earlier levels of processing. This paper focuses on production and identifies several specific effects of phoneme-tomorpheme feedback. In addition. I orgue that there is support for the use of this kind of feedback in production from experimental and naturalistic studies of slips of the tongue. One feature of highly parallel network models of word and letter perception is the existence of positive feedback from the word to the letter level (Adams, 1979; McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1982). So, not only do activated letter units send activation to all words that contain them, but the reverse happens as well. Words send their activation back to the letters that comprise them. This mutual backscratching between words and letters is an elegant mechanism for allowing lexical knowledge to augment stimulus information at the letter level. More generally, positive feedback from “later” to “earlier” levels of processing is a simple way of letting knowledge influence the identification of perceptual features and objects in models that employ connectionist principles. This paper considers the utility of this kind of positive feedback in another information processing domain, the production of ordered behavior. In particular, I will focus on the production of spoken words and consider, first, what positive feedback can contribute to production models in general, and second, what empirical justification there is for adding it to models of human language production.

[1]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Wayne A. Wickelgran Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. , 1969 .

[3]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue , 1975 .

[4]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[5]  D. G. MacKay The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[6]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features , 1985 .

[9]  B. Baars,et al.  ENCODING SENSITIVITIES TO PHONOLOGICAL MARKEDNESS AND TRANSITIONAL PROBABILITY: EVIDENCE FROM SPOONERISMS , 1975 .

[10]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  B. Baars,et al.  Semantic bias effects on the outcomes of verbal slips , 1976, Cognition.

[12]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[13]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  A Critique of Top-down Independent Levels Models of Speech Production: Evidence from Non-plan-Internal Speech Errors , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Limited Use of Distinctive Features and Markedness in Speech Production: Evidence from Speech Error Data. , 1979 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[16]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[17]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[18]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Simulating a Skilled Typist: A Study of Skilled Cognitive-Motor Performance , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  D. G. MacKay Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  G. Dell,et al.  Representation of serial order in speech: evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  The tongue slips into patterns , 1969 .

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[23]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .