Non-invasive atrial fibrillation organization follow-up under successive attempts of electrical cardioversion

The development of non-invasive tools able to provide valuable information about the effectiveness of a shock in external electrical cardioversion (ECV) is clinically relevant to enhance these protocols in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The present contribution analyzes the ability of a non-linear regularity index, such as sample entropy (SampEn), to follow-up non-invasively AF organization under successive attempts of ECV and to predict the effectiveness of every single shock. To this respect, the atrial activity (AA) preceding each delivered shock was extracted by using a QRST cancellation method. Next, the main atrial wave (MAW), which can be considered as the fundamental waveform associated to the AA, was obtained by applying a selective filtering centered on the dominant atrial frequency (DAF). Finally, the MAW organization was estimated with SampEn and two thresholds (Th1 = 0.1223 and Th2 = 0.0832) were established to predict the ECV outcome. Results indicated that, prior to the first attempt, all the patients who needed only one shock to restore NSR were below Th1. In addition, most of them were above Th2 in case of AF relapsing during the first month. Regarding several shocks, all the patients who maintained NSR more than one month were below Th2 after the first shock. Moreover, all the patients who relapsed to AF during the first month were between Th1 and Th2 and, finally, all the patients with ineffective ECV were above Th1. After each unsuccessful shock, a SampEn relative decrease was observed for the patients who finally reverted to NSR, but the largest variation took place after the first attempt, thus indicating that this shock plays the most important role in the procedure. Indeed, by considering jointly the patients who needed only one shock and the patients who needed several shocks, 91.67% (22 out of 24) of ECVs resulting in NSR, 93.55% (29 out of 31) of ECVs relapsing to AF during the first month and 100% (10 out of 10) of ECVs in which NSR was not restored were correctly classified. As conclusion, the MAW organization analysis via SampEn can provide useful information that could improve the effectiveness of conventional external ECV protocols used in AF treatment.

[1]  M. Rich,et al.  Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation , 2009, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[2]  Andreas Bollmann,et al.  Atrial Fibrillatory Frequency Predicts Atrial Defibrillation Threshold and Early Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Internal Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  M. Brezocnik,et al.  Prediction of maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation by non-deterministic modelling. , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  Wavelet bidomain sample entropy analysis to predict spontaneous termination of atrial fibrillation , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[5]  Frédéric Bouchara,et al.  Influence of noise on the sample entropy algorithm. , 2009, Chaos.

[6]  Haitham M. Al-Angari,et al.  Atrial fibrillation and waveform characterization , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Validation and Clinical Application of Time‐Frequency Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Electrocardiograms , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  José Millet-Roig,et al.  Atrial activity extraction for atrial fibrillation analysis using blind source separation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  I Dotsinsky,et al.  Optimization of bi-directional digital filtering for drift suppression in electrocardiogram signals , 2004, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[11]  D. Singer,et al.  Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. , 2001, JAMA.

[12]  E.J. Berbari,et al.  A high-temporal resolution algorithm for quantifying organization during atrial fibrillation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  E. Prystowsky,et al.  The History of Atrial Fibrillation: The Last 100 Years , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Predicting spontaneous termination of atrial fibrillation using the surface ECG. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  [Non-invasive characterization of atrial activity immediately prior to termination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (corrected)]. , 2008, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[16]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  Non-invasive organization variation assessment in the onset and termination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  Steven M. Pincus Assessing Serial Irregularity and Its Implications for Health , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Vergani,et al.  Heart rate variability and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J.M. Smith,et al.  A technique for measurement of the extent of spatial organization of atrial activation during atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J. J. Rieta,et al.  Caracterización no invasiva de la actividad auricular durante los instantes previos a la terminación de la fibrilación auricular paroxística , 2008 .

[21]  A Pizzuti,et al.  Clinical value of left atrial appendage flow velocity for predicting of cardioversion success in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2001, European heart journal.

[22]  R. Page,et al.  Initial energy for elective external cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  M. Allessie,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Epicardial Atrial Electrograms of Electrically Induced Atrial Fibrillation in Man , 1995, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[24]  Stephen S. Cha,et al.  Secular Trends in Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and Implications on the Projections for Future Prevalence , 2006, Circulation.

[25]  A Prakash,et al.  Right and left atrial activation during external direct-current cardioversion shocks delivered for termination of atrial fibrillation in humans. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  B. M. Anner Inhibition of Na,K-ATPase by Transport Inhibitors , 1997 .

[27]  C. Boos,et al.  Higher Energy Monophasic DC Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Is it Time to Start at 360 Joules? , 2003, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[28]  M. Allessie,et al.  High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. , 1994, Circulation.

[29]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications , 2005 .

[30]  J. J. Rieta,et al.  A novel application of sample entropy to the electrocardiogram of atrial fibrillation , 2010 .

[31]  D. Levy,et al.  Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1998, Circulation.

[32]  Jaap Haaksma,et al.  Clustering of RR Intervals Predicts Effective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[33]  J. Mcanulty,et al.  Electrophysiologic predictors of the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation within 30 days of cardioversion. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  Silvia G. Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for PRAC , 2006 .

[35]  G. Calcagnini,et al.  Linear and non-linear analysis of atrial signals and local activation period series during atrial-fibrillation episodes , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[36]  N. Gall,et al.  Electrical Cardioversion for AF—The State of the Art , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[37]  M. Allessie,et al.  Electrophysiologic mechanisms of perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  G. O'hara,et al.  Prediction of the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. , 2006, American heart journal.

[39]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Characterization of atrial fibrillation using the surface ECG: time-dependent spectral properties , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Atrial fibrillation signal organization predicts sinus rhythm maintenance in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. , 2006, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[41]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  An Improved Adaptive Power Line Interference Canceller for Electrocardiography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  A non-invasive method to predict electrical cardioversion outcome of persistent atrial fibrillation , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[43]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  G. Calcagnini,et al.  Descriptors of wavefront propagation , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[45]  Haitham M. Al-Angari,et al.  Atrial fibrillation and waveform characterization. A time domain perspective in the surface ECG. , 2006, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[46]  P. Langley,et al.  Analysis of surface electrocardiograms in atrial fibrillation: techniques, research, and clinical applications. , 2006, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[47]  Giovanni Calcagnini,et al.  Non-linear coupling of atrial activation processes during atrial fibrillation in humans , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Atrial fibrillatory rate and sinus rhythm maintenance in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2006, European heart journal.

[49]  Paul S. Addison,et al.  Wavelet transform analysis predicts outcome of DC cardioversion for atrial fibrillation patients , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[50]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the spatial organization of atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart. , 1996, Circulation.

[51]  L. Sörnmo,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of the atrial cycle length during atrial fibrillation in man: introducing, validating and illustrating a new ECG method. , 1998, Cardiovascular research.

[52]  J. J. Rieta,et al.  Adaptive singular value cancelation of ventricular activity in single-lead atrial fibrillation electrocardiograms , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[53]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Revisiting sample entropy analysis , 2007 .

[54]  Leif Sörnmo,et al.  Chapter 7 – ECG Signal Processing , 2005 .

[55]  S. Pierre,et al.  Inhibition of Na,K‐ATPase by External Electrical Cardioversion in a Sheep Model of Atrial Fibrillation , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[56]  Giovanni Calcagnini,et al.  Endocardial Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation with Basket Catheter , 2006 .

[57]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  Sample entropy of the main atrial wave predicts spontaneous termination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[58]  B. Knight,et al.  Electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. , 2009, Cardiology clinics.

[59]  David E. Haines,et al.  Frequency domain algorithm for quantifying atrial fibrillation organization to increase defibrillation efficacy , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.