An Efficient Traffic Incident Detection and Classification Framework by Leveraging the Efficacy of Model Stacking

Automatic incident detection (AID) plays a vital role among all the safety-critical applications under the parasol of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs) to provide timely information to passengers and other stakeholders (hospitals and rescue, police, and insurance departments) in smart cities. Moreover, accurate classification of these incidents with respect to type and severity assists the Traffic Incident Management Systems (TIMSs) and stakeholders in devising better plans for incident site management and avoiding secondary incidents. Most of the AID systems presented in the literature are incident type-specific, i.e., either they are designed for the detection of accident or congestion. While traveling along the road, one may come across different types of traffic incidents, such as accidents, congestion, and reckless driving. This necessitates that the AID system detects and classifies not only all the popular traffic incident types, but severity as well that is associated with these incidents. Therefore, this study aims to propose an efficient incident detection and classification (E-IDC) framework for smart cities, by incorporating the efficacy of model stacking, to classify the incidents with respect to their types and severity levels. The experimental results showed that the proposed E-IDC framework achieved performance gains of 5%–56% in terms of incident severity classification and 1%–14% in terms of incident type classification when applied with different classifiers. We have also applied the Wilcoxon test to benchmark the performance of our proposed framework that reflects the significance of our approach over existing individual incident predictors in terms of severity and type classification. Moreover, it has been observed that the proposed E-IDC framework outperforms the existing ensemble technique, such as XGBoost used for the classification of incidents.

[1]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[2]  Zafar Iqbal,et al.  Automatic incident detection in smart city using multiple traffic flow parameters via V2X communication , 2018, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[3]  Huajian Chang,et al.  A novel algorithm for urban traffic congestion detection based on GPS data compression , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI).

[4]  Fumihiko Sakaue,et al.  Detection of abnormal driving using multiple view geometry in space-time , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[5]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Bagging-SVMs Algorithm-Based Traffic Incident Detection , 2016 .

[6]  Hussein Zedan,et al.  Context-Aware Driver Behavior Detection System in Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Speed and road accidents : an evaluation of the power model , 2004 .

[8]  Marthinus J. Booysen,et al.  Combining speed and acceleration to detect reckless driving in the informal public transport industry , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[9]  M. Hallenbeck,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF RECURRING VERSUS NON-RECURRING CONGESTION , 2003 .

[10]  Deepak Dembla,et al.  Investigating the security threats in Vehicular ad hoc Networks (VANETs): Towards security engineering for safer on-road transportation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[11]  Ali Movahedi,et al.  Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Madhar Taamneh,et al.  Clustering-based classification of road traffic accidents using hierarchical clustering and artificial neural networks , 2017, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[13]  Qi Wang,et al.  Traffic congestion analysis: A new Perspective , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[14]  Arif Ali Khan,et al.  Methodology for the quantification of the effect of patterns and anti-patterns association on the software quality , 2019, IET Softw..

[15]  Mahamod Ismail,et al.  Abnormal driving detection using real time Global Positioning System data , 2011, Proceeding of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace).

[16]  Tim Lomax,et al.  TTI's 2010 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT Powered by INRIX Traffic Data , 2010 .

[17]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  Accident Risk Prediction based on Heterogeneous Sparse Data: New Dataset and Insights , 2019, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[18]  Joshua D. Naranjo,et al.  A pretest for choosing between logrank and wilcoxon tests in the two-sample problem , 2010 .

[19]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Implications of deep learning for the automation of design patterns organization , 2017, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[20]  Soumik Sarkar,et al.  Traffic Dynamics Exploration and Incident Detection Using Spatiotemporal Graphical Modeling , 2019 .

[21]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  A Traffic Congestion Assessment Method for Urban Road Networks Based on Speed Performance Index , 2016 .

[22]  Chen Cheng,et al.  Ensemble learning approach based on stacking for unmanned surface vehicle's dynamics , 2020 .

[23]  Ching-Hua Chuan,et al.  Evaluating the impact and clearance duration of freeway incidents , 2019, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology.

[24]  D. Schrank,et al.  2012 Urban Mobility Report , 2002 .

[25]  MATTHEW G. KARLAFTIS,et al.  ITS Impacts on Safety and Traffic Management: An Investigation of Secondary Crash Causes , 1999, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[26]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  INCIDENT MANAGEMENT IN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[27]  Chinmay Hegde,et al.  Freeway Traffic Incident Detection from Cameras: A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[28]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  Multivariate copula temporal modeling of intersection crash consequence metrics: A joint estimation of injury severity, crash type, vehicle damage and driver error. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Li-Li Wang,et al.  Automatic incident classification for large-scale traffic data by adaptive boosting SVM , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Menghui Li,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis Based SVM Application on Automatic Incident Detection of Rural Road in China , 2018 .

[31]  Rajesh Krishnan,et al.  A Deep Learning Approach for Traffic Incident Detection in Urban Networks , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[32]  Jinjun Tang,et al.  Crash injury severity analysis using a two-layer Stacking framework. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  John MacInnes ‘Discussion: Towards More Accessible Conceptions of Statistical Inference’ , 2011 .

[34]  April Armstrong,et al.  Traffic Incident Management Handbook , 2010 .

[35]  Changwei Yuan,et al.  Evaluation, Classification, and Influential Factors Analysis of Traffic Congestion in Chinese Cities Using the Online Map Data , 2016 .

[36]  Alejandro Quintero,et al.  Distributed Classification of Urban Congestion Using VANET , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[37]  Kalyan Sasidhar,et al.  Two wheeler rash drive detection using smartphones , 2019, 2019 11th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS).

[38]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[39]  Jianjun Shi,et al.  Detecting and locating of traffic incidents in a road segment based on lane-changing characteristics , 2017 .

[40]  Daphney-Stavroula Zois,et al.  Robust Freeway Accident Detection: A Two–Stage Approach , 2019, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[41]  Dawei Li,et al.  Learning to Detect Traffic Incidents from Data Based on Tree Augmented Naive Bayesian Classifiers , 2017 .

[42]  P. Alam ‘A’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[43]  Emily Parkany,et al.  A COMPLETE REVIEW OF INCIDENT DETECTION ALGORITHMS & THEIR DEPLOYMENT: WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN'T , 2005 .

[44]  Athanasios Theofilatos,et al.  Incorporating real-time traffic and weather data to explore road accident likelihood and severity in urban arterials. , 2017, Journal of safety research.

[45]  Jianli Xiao,et al.  SVM and KNN ensemble learning for traffic incident detection , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[46]  Xin He,et al.  Abnormal Driving Detection Based on Normalized Driving Behavior , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[47]  Yaser E. Hawas,et al.  Optimized multistage fuzzy-based model for incident detection and management on urban streets , 2020, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[48]  Hoang Nguyen,et al.  Automatic classification of traffic incident's severity using machine learning approaches , 2017 .

[49]  A. Karegowda,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ATTRIBUTE SELECTION USING GAIN RATIO AND CORRELATION BASED FEATURE SELECTION , 2010 .

[50]  Xi Jianfeng,et al.  A classification and recognition model for the severity of road traffic accident , 2019, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[51]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[52]  Fouzi Harrou,et al.  Monitoring road traffic congestion using a macroscopic traffic model and a statistical monitoring scheme , 2017 .

[53]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[54]  Sarbani Roy,et al.  Smartphone based system for real-time aggressive driving detection and marking rash driving-prone areas , 2018, ICDCN Workshops.

[55]  Alejandro Quintero,et al.  Cooperative Evaluation of the Cause of Urban Traffic Congestion via Connected Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[56]  Suyoung Chi,et al.  Detection of centerline crossing in abnormal driving using CapsNet , 2018, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[57]  Ramkumar Venkatanarayana,et al.  Traffic Incident Management Quick Clearance Guidance and Implications , 2016 .