Empowering Public Sector Employees to Improve Performance: Does It Work?

For more than a decade, public organizations have been adopting employee empowerment with the aim of improving performance and job satisfaction and promoting innovativeness. Our understanding of employee empowerment has been hindered by a dearth of empirical research on its uses and consequences in the public sector. Based on Bowen and Lawler’s conceptualization of employee empowerment, this study explores the link between various empowerment practices and perceived performance in federal agencies. It is found that empowerment practices aimed at providing employees with access to job-related knowledge and skills and at granting them discretion to change work processes have a positive and substantively significant influence on perceived performance. Other empowerment practices geared toward providing employees with information about goals and performance and offering them rewards based on performance are found, however, to have little bearing on perceptions of performance.

[1]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[2]  J. Kellough,et al.  Pay for Performance in Georgia State Government , 2002 .

[3]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[4]  Christopher Winship,et al.  REGRESSION MODELS WITH ORDINAL VARIABLES , 1984 .

[5]  J. Perry,et al.  Federal Merit Pay, Round II: An Analysis of the Performance Management and Recognition System , 1989 .

[6]  James R. Thompson,et al.  Reinvention As Reform: Assessing the National Performance Review , 2000 .

[7]  Albert Gore,et al.  From red tape to results : creating a government that works better & costs less : report of the National Performance Review ; Vice President Al Gore , 1993 .

[8]  J. Wagner,et al.  PERCEPT-PERCEPT INFLATION IN MICRO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: AN INVESTIGATION OF PREVALENCE AND EFFECT. , 1993 .

[9]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance , 2000 .

[10]  J. Wagner,et al.  Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and Effect , 1994 .

[11]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[12]  William H. Bommer,et al.  ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[13]  J. D. Carroll,et al.  The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review , 1995 .

[14]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori , 2000 .

[15]  George Alexander Boyne,et al.  Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy , 2006 .

[16]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[17]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[18]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[19]  P. Ribeaux,et al.  Motivation and Work , 1978 .

[20]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation , 1983 .

[21]  Jørn Flohr Nielsen,et al.  The consequences and limits of empowerment in financial services , 2003 .

[22]  Martin M. Rosner,et al.  Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation , 1968 .

[23]  Richard S. Hillman,et al.  Bureaucracy and innovation , 1970 .

[24]  Tim Newton,et al.  Frustration in organizations: Relationships to role stress, climate, and psychological strain , 1984 .

[25]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue , 2001 .

[26]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Situational Constraints and Work Outcomes: The Influences Of a Frequently Overlooked Construct , 1980 .

[27]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[28]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[29]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: a comparison of multiple data sources. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[31]  H. Rainey.  Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[32]  R. Perry.  The Relationship of Affective Organizational Commitment with Supervisory Trust , 2004 .

[33]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[34]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[35]  R. Kanter,et al.  Power failure in management circuits. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[36]  Huseyin Leblebici.  New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects , 1999 .

[37]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  C. Matheson.  In Praise of Bureaucracy? A Dissent From Australia , 2007 .

[39]  T. Levitt.  Production-Line Approach to Service , 2012 .

[40]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context , 1999 .

[41]  S. Borins.  Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers, or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence About Innovative Public Managers , 2000 .

[42]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[43]  N. Joseph Cayer,et al.  Changing Federal Government Employee Attitudes Since the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 , 2006 .

[44]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[45]  J. Kellough,et al.  The Paradox of Merit Pay in the Public Sector , 1993 .

[46]  Robert L. Heneman.  The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[47]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  Participative Management and Job Satisfaction: Lessons for Management Leadership , 2002 .

[48]  Paul E. Spector.  Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences , 1997 .

[49]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[50]  Laura Langbein,et al.  Ownership, empowerment, and productivity: Some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of employee discretion , 2000 .

[51]  Innovation in public sector human services programs: the implications of innovation by "groping along". , 1990, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[52]  J. Guzmán.  Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[53]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[55]  B. Wright,et al.  Participation’s Influence on Job Satisfaction , 2004 .

[56]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  If total quality is the change, what's the Fortune 1000 doing with it? The Fortune 1000 and Total Quality , 1992 .

[57]  David E. Lewis,et al.  The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance , 2008 .

[58]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education * , 2001 .

[59]  James L. Perry,et al.  Motivating Employees in a New Governance Era: The Performance Paradigm Revisited , 2006 .

[60]  S. Hagevik,et al.  RESPONSIBLE RISK TAKING , 1999 .

[61]  R. Kearney,et al.  Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective , 1998 .

[62]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[63]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[64]  E. Lawler,et al.  Empowering Service Employees , 1995 .

[65]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models , 1996 .

[66]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[67]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  Measurement Error and Theory Testing in Consumer Research: An Illustration of the Importance of Construct Validation , 1988 .

[68]  Dianne M. Finkelstein,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2005, Technometrics.

[69]  Roy C. Herrenkohl,et al.  Defining and Measuring Employee Empowerment , 1999 .

[70]  Herbert Kaufman,et al.  The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior , 1960 .

[71]  Robert E. Quinn,et al.  Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership , 1999 .

[72]  Joy Palmer,et al.  The Human Organization , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Creating high performance organizations , 2005 .

[74]  Ray W. Coye,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of Employee Participation , 1995 .

[75]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .

[76]  Gene A. Brewer.  In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance , 2005 .

[77]  D. Mcgregor,et al.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[78]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[79]  H. Rainey,et al.  Antecedents, Mediators, and Consequences of Affective, Normative, and Continuance Commitment , 2007 .