Eigenfactor and article influence scores in the Journal Citation Reports

Purpose – This sequel to the earlier testing and evaluation of the five‐year Journal Impact Factor (JIF‐5) in the enhanced version of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) (released in January and July 2009 for the 2007 and 2008 journal collections, respectively) seeks to assess and compare the impact on the ranking of journals by two other performance indicators.Design/methodology/approach – Both the Eigenfactor Score (EFS) and the Article Influence Score (AIS) use a five‐year target window in the algorithm to quantify the scholarly impact at the overall journal level and at the article level, respectively.Findings – The paper examines how the rank positions of 52 library and information science journals change when the set of journals are ranked by the Eigenfactor metrics in relation to the JIF‐5 indicator.Originality/value – The principle behind Google's PageRank is where a web page or site got ranked in the search results based not merely on the number of incoming links, but also on the status/prestige o...

[1]  Thomas E. Nisonger,et al.  The Benefits and Drawbacks of Impact Factor for Journal Collection Management in Libraries , 2004 .

[2]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[3]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Linda Butler,et al.  Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas E. Nisonger,et al.  Use of the Journal Citation Reports for Serials Management in Research Libraries: An Investigation of the Effect of Self-Citation on Journal Rankings in Library and Information Science and Genetics , 2000 .

[6]  Charles Oppenheim Do Citations Count? Citation Indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) , 1996 .

[7]  Gary E. Gorman "They can't read, but they sure can count": Flawed rules of the journal rankings game , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  T. E. Nisonger A methodological issue concerning the use of Social sciences citation index journal citation reports impact factor data for journal ranking , 1994 .

[9]  Carl T. Bergstrom Eigenfactor Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals , 2007 .

[10]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Journal Evaluation: Technical and Practical Issues, , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[11]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings , 2008 .

[12]  Wolfgang Glänzel The multi-dimensionality of journal impact , 2008, Scientometrics.

[13]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[14]  L. Leydesdorff Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations , 2008 .

[15]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[16]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Journal Citation Reports.">Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[17]  D. Pendlebury The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators , 2009, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[18]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Median and percentile impact factors: A set of new indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[19]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[21]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors , 1995 .

[22]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  OPEN PEN ACCESS CCESS , 2008 .

[23]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[24]  P. Jacsó A Deficiency in the Algorithm for Calculating the Impact Factor of Scholarly Journals: The Journal Impact Factor , 2001, Cortex.

[25]  Charles Mercer,et al.  The number game , 2010 .