A template-based approach to Dynamic Airspace Configuration in presence of weather

Dynamic Airspace Configuration (DAC) is an operational paradigm which is aimed at transforming the current, predominantly static and structured, airspace design (configuration) to airspace structure capable of morphing dynamically while taking into consideration user demand and a range of constraints. The dynamic airspace structure is needed to ensure safety while improving efficiency of the airspace operations, thereby resulting in higher (preferably maximum) benefits to the stakeholders. Numerous DAC approaches have been developed in the past. Primarily, these approaches focused on DAC in presence of variation in the traffic levels. Although weather influences airspace capacity, it has been only recently that the weather constraint has been considered explicitly in the DAC algorithms. This paper introduces a three phased framework for the template-based approach to DAC in the presence of weather. One of the three phases is an offline phase, intended to better accommodate training requirements of air traffic controllers, and the remaining two are online phases, designed to augment sectorization to better fit the actual weather/traffic scenario. Results of numerical tests show benefits of this approach over the current operational paradigm.

[1]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Initial Concepts for Dynamic Airspace Configuration , 2007 .

[2]  Hong Kaing,et al.  Dynamic FPAs: A new method for dynamic airspace configuration , 2008, 2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference.

[3]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Approximate earth mover’s distance in linear time , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Min Xue.  Airspace Sector Redesign Based on Voronoi Diagrams , 2008 .

[5]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  A Weighted-Graph Approach for Dynamic Airspace Configuration , 2007 .

[7]  Min Xue,et al.  Airspace Sector Redesign Based on Voronoi Diagrams , 2008, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[8]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A metric for distributions with applications to image databases , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[9]  P. Lucic,et al.  Exploring tactical interaction between dynamic airspace configuration and traffic flow management (DAC-TFM) , 2012, 2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[10]  M. Drew.  Analysis of an optimal sector design method , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[11]  Haibin Ling,et al.  EMD-L1: An Efficient and Robust Algorithm for Comparing Histogram-Based Descriptors , 2006, ECCV.

[12]  Alexander Klein,et al.  Estimating Avoidable Costs Due to Convective Weather Forecast Inaccuracy , 2011 .

[13]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Shin-Lai.  Optimizing Airspace Sectors for Varying Demand Patterns using Multi-Controller Staffing , 2009 .

[15]  C.R. Brinton,et al.  Airspace partitioning using flight clustering and computational geometry , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.